Pages

Thursday, January 8, 2026

More Trump theft.

Click here for Paul Krugman's January 8 Substack post, entitled "The Looting of US Foreign Policy," subtitled "Goodbye, national interest. Hello, ego gratification and profits for the ruling clique" -- which he defines later in the article as "the Trump family and its hangers-on."

 He begins with:

While I was working on this, ICE murdered a woman in Minneapolis. I’m still going to put up the originally planned post, but like every decent American I’m having a hard time thinking about anything else right now. 

Exactly, Paul.

He's referring to a Truth Social post by Trump saying that he will take 30-50 million barrels of oil  from Venezuela. He says "This Oil will be sold at its market Price, and that money will be controlled by me" -- he adds "to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States!" Yeah, fat chance.

This will be in the range of $2 billion; less than .01 percent of the U.S. GDP; "in terms of U.S. oil consumption, that's about 2 days' worth of oil. " Krugman says this is trivial from the perspective of national interest, but it's a fairly big number to "the clique that is currently running the U.S. government" -- the Trump family and its hangers-on:

Trumpist foreign policy has nothing to do with, well, making America great again, and everything to do with raising the wealth and status of the Trump family and its hangers-on — what they call our ruling clique.
When it comes to Trump's threats against Canada and Greenland/Denmark, Krugman says "the Trump clique doesn’t care whether nations have been staunch allies of the United States. They want subservient clients paying tribute, not to America, but to them personally. And that’s something democracies like Canada and Denmark won’t do."

He then says:

Trump has been remarkably transparent about his goals in Venezuela: It’s all about looting. That is, he wants to seize the country’s oil wealth on behalf of himself and his clique. [The hyperlink connects with an article in Popular Information about, among other things, Trump-supporting billionaire, investor Paul Singer, who in November bought Citgo, the U.S.-based subsidiary of Venezuela's state-run oil company.] Some people, notably María Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela’s opposition, have been surprised that Trump shows no interest in restoring democracy. But why would he? He’s unable to enrich himself personally in democracies like Canada and Denmark. But a repressive regime like Venezuela is willing to pay him protection money.

He finishes:

The bottom line is that to understand what Trump is doing around the world you must disabuse yourself of the notion that any of it is about serving America. It’s all about glorifying himself and enriching his clique. 

 

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

"Trump has gone completely mad."

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry for January 7, detailing the murder of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good by an ICE officer in Minneapolis.

 It's a very sad story. In short, Ms. Good was murdered, and  Kristi Noem and Donald Trump are blatantly lying about it, saying she had weaponized her vehicle in an attempt to run over and kill the agent. There were numerous videos taken -- as is and will be the case with a lot of ICE attacks -- and they exonerate Good of any such attempt.

That both DHS and Trump posted false accounts of the shooting even as there are four videos circulating that reveal those accounts to be lies shows they no longer are making any attempt to justify their actions. Instead, they are demanding Americans abandon reality in favor of whatever the administration says. If this works, it would be a demonstration of totalitarian power, the ability to control how people think. Accepting that lie is a loyalty test. 

There's a lot more reporting on the murder, and her diary closes with three financial moves that Trump quietly made today (well, the increase of the military's budget from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion wasn't quiet). 

Her article closes:

Simon Rosenberg of The Hopium Chronicles wrote: “Trump has gone completely mad.”

We're in dangerous, dangerous days, folks. 

 

State of the union: indescribable

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry for January 6, 2026.

It's a wide-ranging condemnation of Donald Trump's actions: threatening to cancel elections, rewriting history and reversing the events of January 6, 2021, claiming that the demonstrators were peaceful and that the real villains were “the Democrats who staged the real insurrection by certifying a fraud-ridden election, ignoring widespread irregularities, and weaponizing federal agencies to hunt down dissenters.” 

She says:

As Biden prepared to leave office in January 2025, Trump claimed that the U.S. was in freefall, “a disaster, a laughing stock all over the World!” But Peter Baker reported in the New York Times that the opposite was true: Biden and his administration were leaving behind a country that was in the best shape it had been since at least 2000.

Trump claims that Biden had destroyed the U.S. economy. Peter Baker in The New York Times quoted chief economist of Moody’s Analytics Mark Zandi, who said back in 2021: “President Trump is inheriting an economy that is about as good as it ever gets.” 

Trump is threatening Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, Greenland, and Canada, and extending his threats beyond the Western Hemisphere to Iran. 

In Venezuela, the U.S. took Maduro and Flores but rather than supporting the actual winner of the 2024 presidential election, Edmundo González, or opposition leader María Corina Machado, the administration left the Maduro government in place, led by former vice president Delcy Rodríguez.

María Luisa Paúl reported in the Washington Post today that in the hours since Maduro’s removal, the Venezuelan government has cracked down on those showing support for the U.S. operation. It detained at least 14 journalists, sent armed gangs into the capital, restricted protests, and arrested citizens who appeared to be “involved in promoting or supporting the armed attack by the United States of America.”

 Finally:

This evening, Trump’s social media account posted: “I am pleased to announce that the interim Authorities in Venezuela will be turning over between 30 and 50 MILLION Barrels of High Quality, Sanctioned Oil, to the United States of America. This Oil will be sold at its Market Price, and that money will be controlled by me, as President of the United States of America, to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States! I have asked Energy Secretary Chris Wright to execute this plan, immediately. It will be taken by storage ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.” 

Lovely. 30 to 50 million barrels of stolen Venezuelan oil are to be directed into a slush fund controlled by him, personally.

When's the State of the Union address? I can't wait to see how he describes this dumpster fire. 

My, my; how things change.

 This was an op ed by Scott Jennings, published by CNN on January 6, 2021:

"This is literally an insurrection. The fact that the US military hasn’t secured the seat of our government already is a failure of leadership by the commander in chief. 

"President Donald Trump caused this insurrection with his lies and conspiracy theories about the election process being rigged against him. It was not stolen, but this madness was fomented by the President and his top advisers over the past several months. His attorney Rudy Giuliani, at a rally on Wednesday, called for “trial by combat” to a roaring crowd. 

"Let me be clear: These rioters are not Republicans. These are not conservatives. These are not patriots bursting into the US Capitol, accosting police officers and destroying public property."

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

January 6, 2026 -- is the American Experiment over?

Click here for a post on Substack by Steven Beschloss entitled "Snapshot: Accountability and Telling the Truth." It's his summary of the events of January 6, 2021.

He includes a quote from Mitch McConnell, Republican Senate Majority Leader at the time, who said:

January 6 was a disgrace. American citizens attacked their own government. They used terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of domestic business they did not like. Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the vice president.

They did this because they’d been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth, because he was angry he’d lost an election. Former President Trump’s actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty…There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day, no question about it.

The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. And having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole, which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth…

The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.

McConnell is a swine who will go down in history as one of the worst of the worst, chief enabler of the Republican party as it made its disastrous transition to MAGA. But he spoke the truth that day.

I watched the events of that day, and I saw the crowd beating whatever Capitol police they could isolate and surround, baying for blood, chanting about Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence. 

Donald Trump is making an all-out effort to reverse popular thinking about what happened on that day. Who are you going to believe, him or your lying eyes? Anyway, if Trump and MAGA get their way, the U.S. will no longer be celebrating July 4th as Independence Day; it will be replaced by January 6. That will be the day that MAGA celebrate their freedom. Lies, lies, lies -- they are flooding the media with their warped revisionist views.

Stephen Miller, who many say is the gray eminence behind the scenes, has gone full-on Nazi.Unless Trump and MAGA can be defeated -- wiped out -- the American experiment is over. It failed. 

 

 

 

It's no longer the rule of law; it's the rule of power.

Bear in mind, some say Stephen Miller is the real power behind the throne; he directs what Trump says and does. Heather Cox Richardson added: "Today, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper: 'We live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power,' he said. 'These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.'” It's a new world, folks.

There's the Gettysburg address, and then there's this.

 This is Donald Trump doing his mock weightlifting shtick. Note the elegant prose:

And my wife -- by the way, my wife hates when I do this. She said -- you know, she's a very classy person, right? She said, "It's so unpresidential." I said, "But I did become president." 

She -- somebody -- she hates when I dance. I said, "Everybody wants me to dance." "Darling, it's not presidential." She actually said, "Could you imagine FDR dancing?" She said that to me. 

And I said -- there's a long history that perhaps she doesn't know, because he was an elegant fellow, even as a Democrat, right? He was -- the attack by Japan. You know, he was quite elegant. But he wouldn't be doing this. But -- but nor would too many others. 

But she says, "Darling, please, the weightlifting is terrible." 

And I have to say this, "The dancing, they really like." She said, "They don't like it. They're just being nice to you." 

I said, "That's not right. The place goes crazy. They're screaming, 'Dance, please.'" 

But the weightlifting -- but no, they go, gets up, and -- (mimes weightlifting) and you see, I want to be more -- but I have somebody watching. I want to be more effusive. I want to really (pants and grunts, miming weightlifting) -- yeah. 

But she gets it. Dropped the thing, walks off the stage, crying. Her mother's crying, her father's crying.  Guy gets up. He said, "Have you lifted before?" "A little bit." 

And he walks up, bing (mimes weightlifting) -- he could have gone, ding, ding, ding. I think it was 112 pounds, right? It's crazy.

For the beautiful boxer -- they have boxing now, and they have a young gentleman who transitioned. He was a very good boxer, but he wanted to be a woman, which is, you know, to each his own. Because I want to be very liberal when it comes to these subjects. I'm trying to get that vote. It's not an easy vote to get. It's very tough for me to get it. 

But he transitioned, and he's -- he transitioned. And the girl was a champion boxer, from Italy, remember? She got up, first round. He hit her, "Pum," (mimes a punch) with a left. A left, for those -- everybody knows, but -- but a left -- Lisa knows better than anybody. But a left is defense. 

He goes, "Pum." (mimes a punch) She's like, "Oh, my God." 

She walked to the corner, remember? She didn't go down, but she did everything else. But she said, "I've never been hit like that before. I don't want to go out again." 

"You can do it. You can do it." Bing. (mimes a punch) She walked off. She said, "That's..." 

He happened to win the gold medal, that young woman. He won the gold medal. There were two transition people; they both won gold medals. 

The whole thing is ridiculous. You have policy on your side. They don't have policy on your side. Right?  You have policy.

This doddering old fool has his finger on the nuclear button. Be afraid. Be very afraid. 



 

Monday, January 5, 2026

China's great! The people are so united!

Here's a post on Truth (?) Social from that esteemed thinker, Donald J. Trump:

China is a VERY unified country. People don't like to admit it. Tremendous UNITY. Why? Simple. One VOTE. ONE. President Xi VOTES. Everybody RESPECTS it. Everyone else RELAXES. Goes home. No CHAOS. No complaints. No endless COMMENT SECTIONS from people who don't understand ANYTHING. Beautiful. Absolutely BEAUTIFUL. Here? People arguing on phones at 2 A.M. Very late. Very angry. Posting nonsense. Sad! People ask me, "Sir, shouldn't there be MORE voices?" WRONG. Too many voices. Very confusing. Very BAD for decision-making. Very UNFAIR to Americans. China doesn't ask 330 MILLION people how they FEEL about MATH. They accept their leader KNOWS what works. I know what works. I've PROVEN it. Again and again. Everyone knows it. Don't worry, LOYAL patriots. Change is COMING. BIG change. Thank you for your ATTENTION to this matter. 

Dear God, make it stop. 

Pete Hegseth disgraces himself; Caring Guy responds

Here is a Twitter post from the totally incompetent Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth: Here is the response from Captain Mark Kelly: And here is the response from the Twitter hero, "Caring Guy":

Thursday, January 1, 2026

"Caring Guy" responds to Republican attacks on Twitter

 Stephen Miller tweeted: "The Refugee Act of 1980 has been one of the gravest historical calamities. It flooded America with “refugees,” from the world’s failed societies, created a vast federally-funded NGO network to support them, granted uncapped welfare, and created a fast-track to citizenship."

Caring Guy responded: "Actually, you have been one of the greatest historical calamities. Of course you don't know what you're talking about, so here I'll help you. 

You're wrong on the law, wrong on the facts, and wrong on history. 

The Refugee Act of 1980 did not “flood America” with refugees. It created, for the first time, a numerical cap on refugee admissions and placed that cap under annual presidential and congressional control. Before 1980, refugee admissions were handled ad hoc through Cold War era parole authority with far less structure or oversight. The Act reduced chaos, it did not create it. 

It did not create uncapped welfare. Refugees are eligible for limited, time bound assistance, generally eight months of Refugee Cash Assistance and access to the same means tested programs as other lawful residents if they qualify. There is no special, unlimited welfare category for refugees. Every dollar is appropriated by Congress annually and audited. Claims of “uncapped welfare” are simply false. 

It did not create a fast track to citizenship. Refugees must wait one year to apply for lawful permanent resident status and then wait the same statutory period as other green card holders, typically five years, before applying for citizenship. There is no shortcut. There is no bypass of the naturalization process. Refugees face some of the most extensive background checks in the entire immigration system. 

*****

 

Medical bankruptcies

The Minnesota child care "fraud"

Republicans are all worked up about Minnesota child care fraud, all because of a YouTube spot by a malicious young punk named Nick Shirley. A guy on Twitter who goes by the handle of "Caring Guy" has written a bunch of excellent tweets on a wide range of subjects responding to MAGA attacks; here are three concerning the Minnesota "scandal" (lightly edited by me):

1. Nick Shirley was not some brave independent investigator. He was a front man working with the GOP while being presented as neutral. That alone matters when his claims were used to accuse entire communities and political opponents. 

And his “evidence” completely collapsed on camera. He pointed to daycare doors being locked, which is not suspicious; it is literally what the law requires to protect children. When asked to back up his fraud numbers, he admitted he could not cite where they came from. Not an audit, not a charging document, not a court filing, nothing. 

The daycare has since produced video showing how his footage was selectively edited and misrepresented. He did not expose anything new. He repackaged investigations that had already been underway for years and added made up numbers for outrage. 

Blame Democrats? Democrats were the ones auditing, investigating, charging, and convicting people in Minnesota for more than two years. Over 100 people charged and dozens convicted does not happen when people are looking the other way. 

The real irony is watching people cheer “accountability” from an administration led by the convicted felon, a man with 34 felony fraud convictions, a fake university that paid $25 million for fraud, a business found liable for fraud in New York, and a charity scheme so fraudulent his family was barred from running charities. 

So what is this terrible revelation? A GOP coordinated influencer, no real evidence, locked doors passed off as scandal, numbers pulled from thin air, and a narrative that collapsed the moment anyone asked basic questions.

2. The fraud you are talking about was identified, audited, investigated, charged, and prosecuted over multiple years, with more than 100 people charged and dozens convicted. That did not happen by accident and it did not happen because Republicans suddenly showed up. It happened because state and federal investigators did their jobs. 

There was no pause, no cover up, and no fear of telling the public. The cases were public, the charges were public, the convictions were public, and the investigations have been ongoing for years. Enforcement was already happening long before Republicans decided to turn it into a talking point. 

What Republicans actually did was coordinate with a YouTuber, present him as an independent investigator when he was not, and try to repackage years-old investigations as breaking news. When pressed for evidence of anything new, his answer was that daycare front doors were locked, which is a legal requirement, and he cited dollar figures he could not source or explain. 

Fraud should be prosecuted, and people should go to jail. Great. That has already been happening. If you think that Democrats ignored billions in fraud while Republicans heroically rode in to save the day, that is nonsense. It's political theater layered on top of work that was already being done. 

3. Minnesota law requires daycare doors to be locked during operating hours. That is not suspicious behavior, it is a safety requirement to prevent unauthorized access to children. Walking up to a locked daycare door with a phone camera does not show fraud, it shows compliance. 

The GOP’s self admitted front man in this stunt, nick shirley, filmed outside facilities at arbitrary times and then implied emptiness meant no children existed. That implication collapses the moment you add context. Security footage released by the centers shows children being dropped off and picked up before and after his visit. Parents, kids, staff, all on camera. That directly contradicts the narrative he tried to sell. 

Reporters did what viral outrage merchants refuse to do, they verified. Journalists from the Star Tribune and local TV stations physically went inside the same daycare centers shown in the video and observed children and staff present during normal hours. That is not “don’t believe your eyes,” that is “don’t let a selectively edited clip replace basic verification.” 

This also was not newly discovered fraud. Issues with childcare and nonprofit fraud in Minnesota were identified, audited, and referred for prosecution years ago under Tim Walz’s administration, with federal authorities involved. Pretending a YouTuber uncovered some hidden conspiracy is revisionist nonsense. 

What people are actually being asked to believe is that locked doors required by law somehow prove a crime, while documented security footage, active licenses, inspections, and on site reporting should be ignored. That is not skepticism, that is confirmation bias.

After Shirley posted another video, Caring Guy replied:

4. GOP-backed Nick, you cut the video precisely where the facts stop helping your narrative. The Minnesota commissioner did not say the center was permanently shut down for fraud. She was describing a temporary licensing or status change, which happens routinely during compliance reviews, corrective action periods, or administrative transitions. You edited the clip to imply a final closure, when that is not what she said. That is not investigative journalism, it is omission by design. 

Receiving $1.9 million in a fiscal year is not proof of fraud. Child care assistance payments are volume based, spread across multiple funding streams, tied to enrollment, attendance, and subsidy eligibility. A center licensed for around 90 children can reach that dollar amount over a year without anything illegal occurring, especially when serving subsidized families. Big numbers sound shocking only when you refuse to explain how the program actually works. 

Locked doors, controlled entry, and sign in procedures are required by Minnesota child care law. You keep filming locked doors as if they are evidence of a crime. They are evidence of compliance. Every licensed daycare in the state is supposed to restrict access for child safety. This has already been explained to you repeatedly. 

You also misrepresented the federal action. The Department of Health and Human Services did not declare that Minnesota daycares committed fraud and then freeze funds as punishment. HHS imposed additional verification and documentation requirements while audits continue, which is a procedural step, not a finding of guilt. Payments resume when documentation is provided, because that is how audits work. Freezing verification pending review is not the same thing as proving fraud. 

 Most importantly, this was not some hidden scandal you uncovered. Minnesota identified child care and nonprofit fraud years ago, audited it, referred cases for prosecution, and involved federal authorities long before your YouTube channel showed up. Pretending you exposed something new is revisionist nonsense.

5. (In reply to Tom Emmer, GOP majority whip, who objected to a video from Minnesota Governor Walz:

Tommy boy, you really think the American people care about your lies? 

You mean another week of you falsely accusing Governor Tim Walz of scamming Minnesota, when the documented record shows the opposite. The fraud you keep referencing was uncovered by state agencies under his administration, referred to law enforcement, and prosecuted in coordination with federal authorities. That is not complicity; that is detection and enforcement. 

The Feeding Our Future scheme was identified by the Minnesota Department of Education starting in 2020 and escalated in 2021 after irregular meal claims were flagged. The state froze payments, referred the matter to prosecutors, and cooperated with a federal investigation that led to one of the largest pandemic fraud cases in the country. That investigation did not originate with outside influencers or partisan outrage posts, it came from auditors and state officials doing their jobs. 

As of the last two years alone, more than 70 individuals have been convicted or pleaded guilty in the case, with dozens more charged and awaiting trial. Federal prosecutors have already recovered hundreds of millions of dollars through forfeitures, restitution orders, and asset seizures, with more still pending. Several defendants received lengthy prison sentences, and additional indictments are ongoing. That is what accountability looks like, not a coverup.

The idea that Walz or his administration “scammed” Minnesota requires believing that state agencies simultaneously uncovered fraud, shut off funding, referred cases to law enforcement, cooperated with federal prosecutors, testified in court, and somehow were secretly running the scheme themselves. That is not a serious claim; it is a talking point that collapses the moment you apply basic causation. 

Under Walz, Minnesota identified the fraud, stopped the payments, brought in the feds, and prosecuted the criminals. The people who stole the money are being sentenced. The state that uncovered the crime is not the criminal. 

If you are looking for someone to be mad at, try the people who committed the fraud, not the administration that exposed it.  

 

So why not have the voter ID requirements Republicans are asking for?

Click "Show More."

Smith v. Trump; qualifications compared

Be sure to click "Show More."

Trump investigating 2020 election fraud! (Needless to say ...)

Click "Show More"!

Excerpt from President Zelenskyy's New Year's Address

“Let's start with the most important. What does Ukraine want? Peace? Yes. At any cost? No. We want the war to end, but not Ukraine. Are we tired? Very much so. Does this mean we're ready to surrender? Anyone who thinks that is deeply mistaken. They clearly still don't understand who Ukrainians are after all these years: A people enduring 1,407 days of full-scale war. Just consider those numbers. That's longer than Nazi occupation of many cities in World War II. 1,407 days of undefeated Ukraine, spending nights in shelters, fighting daily, often without electricity or sleep, many days at the front lines. But always without panic, chaos, or division - united for peace. Do we want the war to end? Absolutely. Why hasn't this happened yet? The answer lies with our neighbor. Can Russia end the war? Yes. Do they want to? No.” 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his New Year’s address, Wed, Dec 31, 2025

"A classic example of divide and conquer."

Reinier van Lanschot, Dutch politician and a Member of the European Parliament:

"What do Trump, Putin, Xi, and the tech autocrats have in common? They are all afraid of a united Europe. And that's why they want to destroy it. The US National Security Strategy says out loud what we have known for years: they want a Europe of 27 weak nations. A classic example of divide and conquer."

Jack Smith's testimony: devastating for Trump

Jack Smith was Special Counsel for President Biden's Department of Justice, overseeing criminal investigations of Donald Trump regarding Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol attack and his mishandling of classified government documents, both of which were dropped when Trump was reelected president. Trump's DOJ opened an investigation of Smith, alleging his actions had been politically motivated.

The House Judiciary Committee recently deposed Smith. Smith asked that his deposition be conducted in public, but the committee instead held the proceedings behind closed doors. Transcript and video of the deposition has just been released. 

I asked ChatGPT: The House Judiciary committee has released special counsel Jack Smith's 255-page deposition. The contents seem highly unfavorable for Trump. Why would the committee, chaired by Republican Jim Jordan, do such a thing?

Here's the reply: 

At first glance it does seem counterintuitive for a Republican-led House Judiciary Committee to release material that reflects badly on Donald Trump. But there are several plausible—and not mutually exclusive—reasons why Jim Jordan’s committee would do it anyway.

1. They believe the process matters more than the optics

Jordan’s committee has consistently framed its investigation as being about alleged politicization of the Justice Department, not about protecting Trump personally. From that perspective:

  • Releasing the full deposition supports their claim of transparency.

  • It lets them argue: “We’re not selectively leaking—read it yourself.”

  • Even unfavorable testimony can be presented as evidence of an overzealous or ideologically driven prosecutor, depending on how Republicans interpret Smith’s answers.

In short, they may believe voters care more about how Trump was investigated than what Smith says about Trump.

2. They assume supporters won’t read 255 pages

This is a very practical political calculation:

  • Most voters—including most Trump supporters—will not read the deposition.

  • What matters is the spin, not the underlying document.

  • Republicans can cherry-pick portions they think help their case (e.g., limits on Smith’s knowledge, reliance on DOJ precedents, internal constraints).

Meanwhile, releasing the full document helps deflect accusations that they are hiding something.

3. Preempting leaks or court-ordered disclosure

Another common motive in congressional investigations:

  • If the deposition was likely to become public anyway—through leaks, FOIA litigation, or court filings—releasing it themselves lets Republicans control the timing and framing.

  • It’s often better politically to say “we released this voluntarily” than to be forced into disclosure later.

4. Institutional interests of Congress

House Judiciary Republicans have been trying to reassert Congress’s authority over DOJ and special counsels generally:

  • Publishing Smith’s testimony creates a public record that can be cited in future legislation or oversight fights.

  • Even damaging testimony can be useful if it shows how much discretion a special counsel has, how decisions were made internally, or how insulated Smith was from political accountability.

From this view, Trump is almost secondary to a longer-term institutional battle.

5. Different Republican factions, different incentives

Not all House Republicans are equally invested in shielding Trump:

  • Some members are more focused on anti-DOJ messaging.

  • Others are positioning themselves as champions of government transparency, regardless of whom it hurts.

  • Jordan himself often prioritizes the fight with federal law enforcement over Trump’s personal legal exposure.

That can lead to decisions that frustrate Trump allies but still make sense within GOP internal politics.

6. Confidence that Trump’s base is immovable

There is also a blunt political reality:

  • Republicans may believe that no testimony—however damaging—will meaningfully erode Trump’s core support.

  • If that’s true, the downside risk of releasing the deposition is low, while the upside (credibility, transparency claims, oversight precedent) is real.


Bottom line

The committee likely calculated that releasing Jack Smith’s deposition:

  • Strengthens their transparency and oversight narrative

  • Helps them in a broader fight with DOJ and special counsels

  • Carries little political risk with Trump’s base

  • Allows Republicans—not Democrats—to control how the document enters the public domain

So even if the substance is unfavorable to Trump, the institutional and political incentives for Jim Jordan’s committee can still point toward disclosure.

 

60 Minutes: Trump government lied in 35+ court cases

The next edition of 60 Minutes after Bari Weiss, editor-in-chief of CBS News, pulled the disgraceful CECOT revelations from the air, contains this gem:

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Step right up! Get it while it lasts!

I asked ChatGPT, 'I know about sneakers, guitars, watches; what else has Trump offered for sale?" Here's the response:

"

Yes — beyond sneakers, guitars, and watches, Donald Trump (and the various organizations selling items under his name or brand) has offered a surprisingly wide array of products for sale over the years. Many of these leverage his political brand and appeal to supporters or collectors. Forbes+1

🛍️ Merchandise & Products Trump Has Sold or Licensed

🪙 Collectibles & Branded Goods

  • Silver and Gold Coins / Medallions – collectible coins featuring Trump’s likeness or presidential symbols. X (formerly Twitter)

  • NFT Trading Cards & Digital Collectibles – digital cards and NFTs sold around his campaigns. Forbes

  • Autographed Memorabilia – signed guitars, mugs, photos, and other items. Forbes

  • Books – royalty income from books, including Save America (illustrated coffee-table type editions). New York Post

📖 Books & Religious Items

  • “God Bless the U.S.A.” Bible – branded editions of the Bible, some themed (e.g., “Veteran” editions) and even limited signature versions. Wikipedia

👕 Apparel & Campaign Swag

  • Hats and T-shirts with slogans like Make America Great Again and Trump 2028 gear (hats, shirts, coolers). Business Insider

  • Flags, Stickers, and Home Decor – MAGA flags, wall art, magnets, and similar items available from official stores. Trump Official Store

☕️ Everyday Items & Accessories

  • Coffee Mugs and Travel Cups — sometimes signed or tied to specific events. Forbes

  • Tote Bags, Wallets, Bobbleheads, Teddy Bears, License Plate Frames, Puzzles — various branded accessories and collectibles available through the “Donald Trump Store.” The Donald Trump Store

📱 Tech & Telecom (Recent and Upcoming)

  • Trump Mobile & T1 Smartphone — a gold-colored smartphone with MAGA-style branding and a Trump-branded mobile plan, although the launch has faced delays. The Guardian

💄 Fragrances

  • Cologne & Perfume Lines — branded fragrances such as Victory 47 and Fight Fight Fight scents. The Times

🧨 Notes on These Products

  • Many items are sold via licensing deals — Trump often licenses his name to other companies rather than manufacturing the products himself. Wikipedia

  • A number of the products tie directly to his political identity, presidential terms (e.g., 45, 47), or campaign messaging. X (formerly Twitter)

  • Trump has pursued legal action against unauthorized sellers of “Trump merchandise” (e.g., counterfeit MAGA shirts and mugs).

 

Bernie on AI

While Hillary would have been light years better than Trump, maybe Bernie would have been even better -- if a self-described socialist could ever be elected president. I don't know what the effects of AI are going to turn out to be, but I damn sure don't want the development to be run by the oligarchs and tech bros without regulation.

Heather Cox Richardson's wrap-up of 2025

Click here for HCR's diary entry on December 30, 2025.

I just learned that Trump has declared nine different national emergencies (none of which was a true emergency), which allows him to take unilateral action. It's useful, of course, in the case of actual emergencies, allowing the president to take rapid action in response without having to go through a fractured congress; but it's not useful in the case of bogus emergencies, declared so that he can bomb boats off the coast of Venezuela or harass immigrants (e.g. renditioning people to the CECOT prison in El Salvador where they will be tortured.

I knew this had happened, but what I didn't know is that if the president declares an emergency and takes action, he can only proceed for 15 days; after that, the action must stop unless validated by congress. For instance, as HCR says, in April, Trump declared some kind of national emergency that allowed him to impose a broad, sweeping system of harsh tariffs. After the 15-day period, Democrats would definitely challenge the tariffs, since the imposition of tariffs is a right granted strictly to congress. Such a challenge would almost certainly succeed. However -- and he is allowed by House rules to do this -- Speaker Johnson declared that for the narrow purpose of the emergency actions, the remainder of the legislative session -- until the next election -- to be considered as one day. One day! Thus the 15-day mark could never be reached, and no one can challenge Trump's bogus emergencies. Preposterous. 

After recounting the highlights -- there were many, many more examples of Trump acting in an authoritarian fashion -- HCR ends on an optimistic note that I don't entirely agree with:

As we reach the end of 2025, it appears the law is catching up to an administration that began the year by acting as if the law and the Constitution didn’t exist.

More than that, though, over the course of 2025, the administration’s refusal to recognize the tenets of American democracy has roused the American people to defend that democracy.

It appears that as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, when British colonists on the North American continent took the radical step of rejecting the idea not just of King George III but of all kings, and launched the experiment of government based on the rule of law created by the people themselves, the American people are reclaiming that history.

 

Monday, December 29, 2025

Trump-Zelensky meeting at Mar-a-Lago, December 28, 2025

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American" diary entry on Monday, December 29. 

The article starts by saying that Trump said in a televised interview that the U.S. had hit Venezuelan docks that were loading facilities for drugs. But no U.S. organization -- State Department, CIA, DEA, U.S. Special Operations Command, etc. -- has verified Trump's statement. Neither has Venenzuela. So Americans find themselves in the situation of wondering whether it even happened, or is it something Trump has read or hears somewhere and he got it wrong. 

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo commented: “It’s a good commentary on 2025 that the US President announces a major military attack on a foreign country and even the straightest arrows think, 50% chance it’s an attack, 50% chance president is on another cognition bender.”
 Then she gets into Zelensky's meeting with Trump. While Trump had met Putin on the red carpet rolled out for him when he arrived to meet with Trump in Alaska in August, Zelensky's visit was treated a little differently: no U.S. government representative was there to greet Zelensky. The only official representative was Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S.

Trump had a 2-hour phone call with Putin immediately before the Mar-a-Lago meeting; Trump told reporters after the meeting that Putin had expressed a desire that Ukraine succeed (??!!). A news item from the day was that Russia reported that 90 drones had attacked Putin's home, a report that was immediately denied by Ukraine. It made Trump angry, however, and while there has been no proof that the attack took place, Trump said that Putin had told him on the phone call that the attack had taken place.

 Weird. 

Friday, December 26, 2025

"What's really going on with Europe now."

This is a post by Peter W. Kruger copied directly from Twitter:


My dear American friends, let me give you the clear picture of what’s really going on with Europe now.
 
For the last 80 years, Western European public opinion was essentially split in two. On one side, about half of us truly hated you: the hard Marxist-lefties, who, living in the Soviet paradise delusion, viewed you as the embodiment of imperialist capitalism; the extreme-right who resented you for defeating them and for kicking them out of power back in 1945. 
 
But, on the other side, mostly in the center (but not only), you had the rest of Western European public opinion that was enormously grateful for what you had done during World War 2 and after: for freeing Europe of nazi-fascist oppression, and even more for protecting us against the Soviet threat. 
 
I was part of the latter group and, boy, did we love you. We loved your pop culture, your consumer products, your innovation, the spirit of freedom, originality, and optimism that came from America. We defended you against our own cynics. And guess what? We were also among the loudest critics of Europe, accusing it of being too complacent, reliant on others, bogged down by bureaucracy, and failing to ensure its own security and freedoms. (Not that your protection didn’t come with massive returns for you in terms of market-access and the trillions of US treasuries that we bought to prop up your ridiculously gigantic public debt...). 
 
Here is the problem now. Over the past few years, and especially since you brought Mr Brain-Rot MAGA Uber-Moron in Command back to the White House, not to mention the whole gang of globally corrupt and Russian-fed tech-broligarcs from Silicon Valley, you’ve managed to really hard piss off even that part of Western public opinion that loved you and respected you. 
 
Yeah, you may think that now you’ve made new friends in Europe. But don’t be fooled by the apparent Euro ultra-right enthusiasm for Trump, from the likes of Orban, Fico, Salvini etc.. They see you as instrumental in tearing down the EU edifice, but deep down, believe me, they hate you more than even the most radical euro-communist. Their ideology is pure "Blood and Soil." They will never forgive you for what you did to them 80 years ago (just as Putin will never forgive you for what you did to the Soviet Union 40 years ago). Plus, as true suprematist-racists, they believe that no society is more culturally and racially corrupt than the USA with all its racial and ethnic diversity. You’re the epitome of rot to them. They are using you to dismantle the European Union. Once that is done, you will find that their nationalism excludes you just as fiercely as it excludes everyone else. And good luck with selling them your junk food and products (you have no freaking idea how protectionist, conservative, and reactionary they are). You’ll discover it soon.
 
And don’t get me even started with Central-Eastern Europeans. Everyone loved you in Poland, Romania, the Baltics, etc. (even the communists, though they could never say so publicly). They know the cost of occupation. But they also know all too well the price of Western backstabbing (as when they were abandoned to Stalin by Roosevelt & co.). Now that you’ve decided to leave them totally exposed to resurgent Russian genocidal imperialism, you are converting their love into a profound sense of betrayal. 
 
Though, be reassured. No matter how difficult the situation may be for us, Europe is going nowhere. We’ve been here for the last 5000 years, since the first Indo-European nomads started roaming west from the steppe plains (yes, modern day Ukraine…). We survived multiple civilization collapses, plagues, invasions, religious civil wars, the wildest revolutions, an almost continuous state of war, including inflicting on ourselves the most devastating World Wars of all time. There's absolutely no place on earth that has gone through so much history as Europe has (forget the Sumerians and Egyptian pyramids). And yet, we’re still here. Going nowhere. It may take time (and a lot of suffering), but we’ll adapt also to your betrayal. 
 
In the meantime, good luck dealing with the New Imperial Global Multipolar Order that your current leadership is so enthusiastically willing to negotiate with the Putins, Modis, and Xi Jinpings of the world (on the spoils of “weak” Europe). You have no idea. As a society, you are even more fractured, polarized and weaker than Europe is. Putin, Modi, and Xi Jinping are just going to eat you up for breakfast. 
 
Oh, yeah. In the darkest moments, don’t come whining over the Atlantic. No matter what, no one trusts you anymore here. We may still help you, but it won't come free ad it will require a lot of forgiveness. After all, that’s the fate reserved to all traitors.
StenoCommander



Thursday, December 25, 2025

Gunfire at Nakatomi Plaza!

Anderson Cooper and Even Perez at CNN have more on the story:

Trump's a very aesthetic person.

Click here for a 3D look inside the Trump Gold -- I mean White House.

Monday, December 22, 2025

Blatant Trump Corruption

"On Dec 5, FIFA handed Donald Trump a made-up honor called the “FIFA Peace Prize.” Four days later — Dec 9 — Trump’s DOJ moved to kill a major FIFA corruption case."

Trump appoints a special envoy to Greenland.

Trump appointed the sitting governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, to fill a new post, special envoy to Greenland.

In his acceptance of the post, Landry stated: “It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the U.S.” 

Here is the text of an open letter from the Prime Minister of Greenland (an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark):

Dear fellow citizens, 
 
Once again, we have woken up to a new statement from the American president, who has now appointed a special envoy to Greenland. It may sound significant, but it does not change anything for us here at home. We decide our own future. Greenland is our country. We have our own democracy, our own decisions, and a strong community that stands firm. Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people, and territorial integrity must be respected. We are happy to cooperate with other countries, including the United States, but this must always be done with respect for us and for our values and wishes. There is no reason for concern. We stand together, and we stand firm.
 
Take good care of one another as we approach Christmas.
 
In other words, don't pay any attention to Trump; it's just more hot air.