Pages

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Step right up! Get it while it lasts!

I asked ChatGPT, 'I know about sneakers, guitars, watches; what else has Trump offered for sale?" Here's the response:

"

Yes — beyond sneakers, guitars, and watches, Donald Trump (and the various organizations selling items under his name or brand) has offered a surprisingly wide array of products for sale over the years. Many of these leverage his political brand and appeal to supporters or collectors. Forbes+1

๐Ÿ›️ Merchandise & Products Trump Has Sold or Licensed

๐Ÿช™ Collectibles & Branded Goods

  • Silver and Gold Coins / Medallions – collectible coins featuring Trump’s likeness or presidential symbols. X (formerly Twitter)

  • NFT Trading Cards & Digital Collectibles – digital cards and NFTs sold around his campaigns. Forbes

  • Autographed Memorabilia – signed guitars, mugs, photos, and other items. Forbes

  • Books – royalty income from books, including Save America (illustrated coffee-table type editions). New York Post

๐Ÿ“– Books & Religious Items

  • “God Bless the U.S.A.” Bible – branded editions of the Bible, some themed (e.g., “Veteran” editions) and even limited signature versions. Wikipedia

๐Ÿ‘• Apparel & Campaign Swag

  • Hats and T-shirts with slogans like Make America Great Again and Trump 2028 gear (hats, shirts, coolers). Business Insider

  • Flags, Stickers, and Home Decor – MAGA flags, wall art, magnets, and similar items available from official stores. Trump Official Store

☕️ Everyday Items & Accessories

  • Coffee Mugs and Travel Cups — sometimes signed or tied to specific events. Forbes

  • Tote Bags, Wallets, Bobbleheads, Teddy Bears, License Plate Frames, Puzzles — various branded accessories and collectibles available through the “Donald Trump Store.” The Donald Trump Store

๐Ÿ“ฑ Tech & Telecom (Recent and Upcoming)

  • Trump Mobile & T1 Smartphone — a gold-colored smartphone with MAGA-style branding and a Trump-branded mobile plan, although the launch has faced delays. The Guardian

๐Ÿ’„ Fragrances

  • Cologne & Perfume Lines — branded fragrances such as Victory 47 and Fight Fight Fight scents. The Times

๐Ÿงจ Notes on These Products

  • Many items are sold via licensing deals — Trump often licenses his name to other companies rather than manufacturing the products himself. Wikipedia

  • A number of the products tie directly to his political identity, presidential terms (e.g., 45, 47), or campaign messaging. X (formerly Twitter)

  • Trump has pursued legal action against unauthorized sellers of “Trump merchandise” (e.g., counterfeit MAGA shirts and mugs).

 

Bernie on AI

While Hillary would have been light years better than Trump, maybe Bernie would have been even better -- if a self-described socialist could ever be elected president. I don't know what the effects of AI are going to turn out to be, but I damn sure don't want the development to be run by the oligarchs and tech bros without regulation.

Heather Cox Richardson's wrap-up of 2025

Click here for HCR's diary entry on December 30, 2025.

I just learned that Trump has declared nine different national emergencies (none of which was a true emergency), which allows him to take unilateral action. It's useful, of course, in the case of actual emergencies, allowing the president to take rapid action in response without having to go through a fractured congress; but it's not useful in the case of bogus emergencies, declared so that he can bomb boats off the coast of Venezuela or harass immigrants (e.g. renditioning people to the CECOT prison in El Salvador where they will be tortured.

I knew this had happened, but what I didn't know is that if the president declares an emergency and takes action, he can only proceed for 15 days; after that, the action must stop unless validated by congress. For instance, as HCR says, in April, Trump declared some kind of national emergency that allowed him to impose a broad, sweeping system of harsh tariffs. After the 15-day period, Democrats would definitely challenge the tariffs, since the imposition of tariffs is a right granted strictly to congress. Such a challenge would almost certainly succeed. However -- and he is allowed by House rules to do this -- Speaker Johnson declared that for the narrow purpose of the emergency actions, the remainder of the legislative session -- until the next election -- to be considered as one day. One day! Thus the 15-day mark could never be reached, and no one can challenge Trump's bogus emergencies. Preposterous. 

After recounting the highlights -- there were many, many more examples of Trump acting in an authoritarian fashion -- HCR ends on an optimistic note that I don't entirely agree with:

As we reach the end of 2025, it appears the law is catching up to an administration that began the year by acting as if the law and the Constitution didn’t exist.

More than that, though, over the course of 2025, the administration’s refusal to recognize the tenets of American democracy has roused the American people to defend that democracy.

It appears that as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, when British colonists on the North American continent took the radical step of rejecting the idea not just of King George III but of all kings, and launched the experiment of government based on the rule of law created by the people themselves, the American people are reclaiming that history.

 

Monday, December 29, 2025

Trump-Zelensky meeting at Mar-a-Lago, December 28, 2025

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American" diary entry on Monday, December 29. 

The article starts by saying that Trump said in a televised interview that the U.S. had hit Venezuelan docks that were loading facilities for drugs. But no U.S. organization -- State Department, CIA, DEA, U.S. Special Operations Command, etc. -- has verified Trump's statement. Neither has Venenzuela. So Americans find themselves in the situation of wondering whether it even happened, or is it something Trump has read or hears somewhere and he got it wrong. 

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo commented: “It’s a good commentary on 2025 that the US President announces a major military attack on a foreign country and even the straightest arrows think, 50% chance it’s an attack, 50% chance president is on another cognition bender.”
 Then she gets into Zelensky's meeting with Trump. While Trump had met Putin on the red carpet rolled out for him when he arrived to meet with Trump in Alaska in August, Zelensky's visit was treated a little differently: no U.S. government representative was there to greet Zelensky. The only official representative was Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S.

Trump had a 2-hour phone call with Putin immediately before the Mar-a-Lago meeting; Trump told reporters after the meeting that Putin had expressed a desire that Ukraine succeed (??!!). A news item from the day was that Russia reported that 90 drones had attacked Putin's home, a report that was immediately denied by Ukraine. It made Trump angry, however, and while there has been no proof that the attack took place, Trump said that Putin had told him on the phone call that the attack had taken place.

 Weird. 

Friday, December 26, 2025

"What's really going on with Europe now."

This is a post by Peter W. Kruger copied directly from Twitter:


My dear American friends, let me give you the clear picture of what’s really going on with Europe now.
 
For the last 80 years, Western European public opinion was essentially split in two. On one side, about half of us truly hated you: the hard Marxist-lefties, who, living in the Soviet paradise delusion, viewed you as the embodiment of imperialist capitalism; the extreme-right who resented you for defeating them and for kicking them out of power back in 1945. 
 
But, on the other side, mostly in the center (but not only), you had the rest of Western European public opinion that was enormously grateful for what you had done during World War 2 and after: for freeing Europe of nazi-fascist oppression, and even more for protecting us against the Soviet threat. 
 
I was part of the latter group and, boy, did we love you. We loved your pop culture, your consumer products, your innovation, the spirit of freedom, originality, and optimism that came from America. We defended you against our own cynics. And guess what? We were also among the loudest critics of Europe, accusing it of being too complacent, reliant on others, bogged down by bureaucracy, and failing to ensure its own security and freedoms. (Not that your protection didn’t come with massive returns for you in terms of market-access and the trillions of US treasuries that we bought to prop up your ridiculously gigantic public debt...). 
 
Here is the problem now. Over the past few years, and especially since you brought Mr Brain-Rot MAGA Uber-Moron in Command back to the White House, not to mention the whole gang of globally corrupt and Russian-fed tech-broligarcs from Silicon Valley, you’ve managed to really hard piss off even that part of Western public opinion that loved you and respected you. 
 
Yeah, you may think that now you’ve made new friends in Europe. But don’t be fooled by the apparent Euro ultra-right enthusiasm for Trump, from the likes of Orban, Fico, Salvini etc.. They see you as instrumental in tearing down the EU edifice, but deep down, believe me, they hate you more than even the most radical euro-communist. Their ideology is pure "Blood and Soil." They will never forgive you for what you did to them 80 years ago (just as Putin will never forgive you for what you did to the Soviet Union 40 years ago). Plus, as true suprematist-racists, they believe that no society is more culturally and racially corrupt than the USA with all its racial and ethnic diversity. You’re the epitome of rot to them. They are using you to dismantle the European Union. Once that is done, you will find that their nationalism excludes you just as fiercely as it excludes everyone else. And good luck with selling them your junk food and products (you have no freaking idea how protectionist, conservative, and reactionary they are). You’ll discover it soon.
 
And don’t get me even started with Central-Eastern Europeans. Everyone loved you in Poland, Romania, the Baltics, etc. (even the communists, though they could never say so publicly). They know the cost of occupation. But they also know all too well the price of Western backstabbing (as when they were abandoned to Stalin by Roosevelt & co.). Now that you’ve decided to leave them totally exposed to resurgent Russian genocidal imperialism, you are converting their love into a profound sense of betrayal. 
 
Though, be reassured. No matter how difficult the situation may be for us, Europe is going nowhere. We’ve been here for the last 5000 years, since the first Indo-European nomads started roaming west from the steppe plains (yes, modern day Ukraine…). We survived multiple civilization collapses, plagues, invasions, religious civil wars, the wildest revolutions, an almost continuous state of war, including inflicting on ourselves the most devastating World Wars of all time. There's absolutely no place on earth that has gone through so much history as Europe has (forget the Sumerians and Egyptian pyramids). And yet, we’re still here. Going nowhere. It may take time (and a lot of suffering), but we’ll adapt also to your betrayal. 
 
In the meantime, good luck dealing with the New Imperial Global Multipolar Order that your current leadership is so enthusiastically willing to negotiate with the Putins, Modis, and Xi Jinpings of the world (on the spoils of “weak” Europe). You have no idea. As a society, you are even more fractured, polarized and weaker than Europe is. Putin, Modi, and Xi Jinping are just going to eat you up for breakfast. 
 
Oh, yeah. In the darkest moments, don’t come whining over the Atlantic. No matter what, no one trusts you anymore here. We may still help you, but it won't come free ad it will require a lot of forgiveness. After all, that’s the fate reserved to all traitors.
StenoCommander



Thursday, December 25, 2025

Gunfire at Nakatomi Plaza!

Anderson Cooper and Even Perez at CNN have more on the story:

Trump's a very aesthetic person.

Click here for a 3D look inside the Trump Gold -- I mean White House.

Monday, December 22, 2025

Blatant Trump Corruption

"On Dec 5, FIFA handed Donald Trump a made-up honor called the “FIFA Peace Prize.” Four days later — Dec 9 — Trump’s DOJ moved to kill a major FIFA corruption case."

Trump appoints a special envoy to Greenland.

Trump appointed the sitting governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, to fill a new post, special envoy to Greenland.

In his acceptance of the post, Landry stated: “It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the U.S.” 

Here is the text of an open letter from the Prime Minister of Greenland (an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark):

Dear fellow citizens, 
 
Once again, we have woken up to a new statement from the American president, who has now appointed a special envoy to Greenland. It may sound significant, but it does not change anything for us here at home. We decide our own future. Greenland is our country. We have our own democracy, our own decisions, and a strong community that stands firm. Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people, and territorial integrity must be respected. We are happy to cooperate with other countries, including the United States, but this must always be done with respect for us and for our values and wishes. There is no reason for concern. We stand together, and we stand firm.
 
Take good care of one another as we approach Christmas.
 
In other words, don't pay any attention to Trump; it's just more hot air. 

King Donald I

Click here for an excellent article in The New York Times by Peter Baker, entitled "Trump Takes America's 'Imperial Presidency' to a New Level," subtitled "In his first year back in the White House, President Trump has greatly expanded executive power while embracing the trappings of royalty in ways not seen in the modern era."

When President Trump hosted the crown prince of Saudi Arabia last month, he pulled out all the stops. To the traditional pomp of a formal White House visit, he added a few even fancier touches: a stirring military flyover, a procession of black horses and long, regal tables for the lavish dinner in the East Room instead of the typical round tables.

For surprised White House veterans who were paying attention, the unusual flourishes looked a little familiar. Just two months earlier, King Charles III of Britain welcomed Mr. Trump for a state visit that included, yes, a stirring military flyover, a procession of black horses and a long, regal table for the lavish dinner in St. George’s Hall at Windsor Palace.

In his first year back in office, Mr. Trump has unabashedly adopted the trappings of royalty just as he has asserted virtually unbridled power to transform American government and society to his liking. In both pageantry and policy, Mr. Trump has established a new, more audacious version of the imperial presidency that goes far beyond even the one associated with Richard M. Nixon, for whom the term was popularized half a century ago.

What do Americans think of their new monarch?

To his supporters, Mr. Trump’s assertion of vast power is invigorating, not disturbing. In a country they see in decline, a strong hand is the only way to dislodge a liberal, “woke” deep state that in their view has suffocated everyday Americans to the advantage of unwelcome immigrants, street criminals, globalist tycoons, underqualified minorities and out-of-touch elites. Voters struggling to maintain their standards of living or make sense of a society changing rapidly around them have twice given Mr. Trump a chance to make good on his promise to blow up politics as usual and address their concerns.

To his critics, Mr. Trump is narcissistic, uncouth, corrupt and a danger to American democracy. He has used the office to enrich himself and his family, sullied the image of the United States around the world, sought to erase the true history of Black Americans and pursued policies that harm the very people he purports to represent.

Will Trump be successful in his attempts?

Russell Riley, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, acknowledged the nation’s long history of expanding presidential authority. But, he added, “we have an equally robust history of cramming the presidency back into its constitutional box once war or economic crisis has passed.” 

 

 

Sunday, December 21, 2025

Of all the things that didn't happen, this didn't happen the most.

Tucker Carlson's problems are worse than I thought.

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Krugman on Social Media

Click here for a Substack article by Paul Krugman entitled "America Has Become A Digital Narco-State."

He compares social media, with the potential and actual harm it does, to the narcotics industry. 

Yesterday I wrote about how hostility to Europe is a central theme of the Trump administration’s recently released National Security Strategy. The main driver of that hostility appears to be MAGA fury at the nations of Europe for being excessively protective of civil liberties and insufficiently racist.

A secondary source of anti-Europe sentiment, however, is the tech broligarchy’s fury at the European Union’s Digital Services Act. The Act obliges large platforms to self-police a variety of potential injurious effects ranging from “dissemination of illegal content” to “negative consequences” for “physical and mental well-being.”

Krugman says:

Under the auspices of its Digital Services Act, the European Commission imposed its first fine last week — 120 million euros, basically a tiny slap on the wrist — on Musk’s X. The Commission’s case is straightforward:

· X’s “Blue checks” are a fraud. X claims that a blue check means that the poster’s identity has been verified. But in fact X sells them without making any effort to verify that posters are who they say they are.

· X does not provide enough information on advertisements for outsiders to determine whether or not they are scams

· X refuses to make its public data available to researchers

These are clear violations of European law, and the fine, as I said, was little more than a slap on the wrist. Yet Musk went berserk, declaring that the EU should be abolished and threatening personal retribution against the “woke Stasi commissars” responsible for the fine.

And he finishes:

The key point is that if you think of unregulated social media as dangerous drugs, as you should, then we’ve become a nation in which drug lords control much of government policy. Social media billionaires have enough power to prevent us from protecting our own children. They have enough power to dictate U.S. foreign policy, punishing our erstwhile allies for daring to limit their ability to push their product.

America has, in practice, become a digital narco-state.

 

 

 

Saturday, December 6, 2025

An alarming American proclamation

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's entry in her diary, Letters from an American, for December 5, 2025, where she talks about the quiet release of the United States' 2025 National Security Strategy.

"The Trump administration’s NSS announces a dramatic reworking of the foreign policy the U.S. has embraced since World War II." 

The NSS is intended to be published annually, though some years have been missed, particularly under Clinton's administration. 

The document reorients the U.S. away from traditional European allies toward Russia. The authors reject Europe’s current course, suggesting that Europe is in danger of “civilizational erasure” and calling for the U.S. to “help Europe correct its current trajectory” by “restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.” Allowing continued migration will render Europe “unrecognizable” within twenty years, the authors say, and they back away from NATO by suggesting that as they become more multicultural, Europe’s societies might have a different relationship to NATO than “those who signed the NATO charter.”

In contrast to their complaints about the liberal democracies in Europe, the document’s authors do not suggest that Russia is a country of concern to the U.S., a dramatic change from past NSS documents. Instead, they complain that “European officials…hold unrealistic expectations” for an end to Russia’s war against Ukraine, and that European governments are suppressing far-right political parties. They bow to Russian demands by calling for “[e]nding the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance.”

Furthermore:

Walking away from the U.S.-led international systems that reinforce the principles of national self-determination and have kept the world relatively safe since World War II, the Trump administration is embracing the old idea of spheres of influence in which less powerful countries are controlled by great powers, a system in place before World War II and favored now by Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, among others.

National security specialist Anne Applebaum wrote: “The new National Security Strategy is a propaganda document, designed to be widely read. It is also a performative suicide. Hard to think of another great power ever abdicating its influence so quickly and so publicly.”

European Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Ulrike Franke commented: “The transatlantic relationship as we know it is over. Yes, we kinda knew this. But this is now official US White House policy. Not a speech, not a statement. The West as it used to be no longer exists.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, December 5, 2025

We need Cam on the Fever!

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Paul Krugman on Trump's treatment of disaster victims

Click here for Paul Krugman's Substack article on December 3, 2025, entitled "Trump to Disaster Victims: Drop Dead."

 The cruelty of Trump and his crew is a feature, not a bug. 

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Pete Hegseth, 2016, on war crimes and following unlawful orders

Monday, December 1, 2025

Trump corruption

Click here for the Heather Cox Richardson entry in her diary, Letters from an American, for November 30, 2025. It details some of Trump's and his family's corruption -- but it's just the tip of the iceberg. There's so much more.

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Hey, ATCs -- control this!

Thursday, November 27, 2025

"The worst of the worst?" I don't think so.

Trump's Golf Tab

 

Trump Is Racking Up a Colossal Tab Just Playing Golf

A new report reveals the extraordinary sum President Trump has spent playing golf.

Donald Trump swings a golf club and wears a white USA cap.
Jane Barlow/PA Images/Getty Images

Donald Trump has already spent $70 million of taxpayer money on golfing in less than a year as president. If this pace keeps up, he will spend $300 million playing golf by the time his second term ends. 

HuffPost reports that the president on Wednesday made his sixteenth trip this year to his Mar-a-Lago estate and went golfing. Each trip carries a $3.4 million bill in travel and security costs. If Trump decides to go to Mar-a-Lago twice more before the end of the year, he will have spent a total of $75 million on golf, which, repeated each of the following three years, would result in $300 million spent on the trips.

That’s nearly double the $151.5 million in tax dollars Trump spent golfing in his first term as president. Trump spent a third of 2017, his first year as president, hanging out at his private clubs. This time, Trump has also made nine trips to his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, spending $1.1 million on each trip. He also went to Aberdeen, Scotland, in July to promote a new golf course at his resort there, spending close to $10 million on the trip.  

The security costs Trump incurs on his Florida trips can get pretty high, with machine gun–mounted patrol boats manning the nearby Intracoastal Waterway and the Coast Guard patrolling in the vicinity in the Atlantic Ocean. Using Air Force One costs $273,063 per hour to fly to Palm Beach International Airport, meaning that one four-hour round trip to Mar-a-Lago costs the taxpayer $1.1 million. 

In 2016, before Trump was elected, he mocked President Obama’s work ethic, claiming that he was “worse than Carter” for how often he golfed. In the end, Obama only spent $85 million of taxpayer dollars in his eight years as president on golf. 

Meanwhile, Trump has not only eclipsed that in his nearly five years as president, he’s shaped his presidency around golf. He has promoted his golf business on the White House social platform and even decided to deploy the National Guard in Washington, D.C., because he hated seeing homeless people on his way to play golf. 

Last month, Trump took dirt from his White House demolition and sent it to a golf course he’s taking over in Washington. It’s a fitting act for his presidency: taking something from the taxpayer and putting it toward playing an expensive game that he appears to cheat at. 

Sunday, November 23, 2025

Donald Trump and Andrew Johnson

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry in "Letters from an American" for November 22, 2025.

 On Tuesday, November 18, six Democratic lawmakers, veterans of the U.S. military or intelligence services, released a video saying service members should refuse to obey unlawful orders. This should not have received any criticism, as the principle is a cornerstone of U.S. military doctrine; events such as the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, national guard troops killing student demonstrators at Kent State, and the prisoner mistreatment at Abu Ghraib during the Iraq war would not have taken place had soldiers refused their orders. The German defense at the Nuremberg trials -- "I was a good soldier; I was only following orders" -- did not stand up, and the defendants were all either hanged or sentenced to long prison terms.

Donald Trump didn't see it that way, and posted on social media that this was "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" Today, November 23, he is continuing to attack the six lawmakers.

Richardson notes that Trump's behavior is not unprecedented; Andrew Johnson, a Southern Democrat who became president for the remainder of Lincoln's term, from 1865 until 1868, had called for certain Republican opponents to be hanged. For this and other reasons, Johnson was impeached in the House, and escaped conviction in the Senate (and consequent removal from office) by a single vote.

 Richardson's article goes into some detail about Johnson's behavior during his term in office, when he attempted to repress black Americans in the south (he was a strong Southern Democrat) and undo Lincoln's civil rights achievements. Johnson had a tumultuous term in office, and his reactionary policies resulted in a massive defeat in the midterms in 1866, with Republicans winning a two-thirds majority in the House. The House proceeded to pass the Fourteenth Amendment, granting citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and ensuring equal protection under the law, particularly for former slaves, and prohibiting the denial of life, liberty, or property without due process.

Johnson is widely considered the second-worst president in history, after James Buchanan (1856-1860), who allowed the South to slip into the Civil War. (Trump is generally considered the third-worst, but since he seems to be doing worse every day, he may yet pass Buchanan and Johnson in the worst-president sweepstakes.) 

 

Saturday, November 22, 2025

Trump's pro-Russian "peace plan" for Ukraine

This is a good short summary of the situation in Ukraine by Heather Cox Richardson in her November 21 diary entry, "Letters from an American."

Something to keep in mind while you're reading this: In 2016, after Trump had been selected as the Republican presidential candidate, the Republican party drafted a platform, as both Republicans and Democrats had done since time immemorial -- a statement of what the party stood for. (This was the last time the Republicans drafted a platform: After that, rather than draft another platform for 2020 and 2024, they simply declared their platform to be whatever Donald Trump said it was. They did that because it was impossible to state what principles the Republicans stood for, because that could change overnight on a whim if Trump decided something different.)

The Republicans presented their platform to Trump to his approval. To their surprise, Trump accepted the whole thing without asking for any changes -- except for one. Russia had invaded Crimea in 2014, and the Republican party had been staunchly anti-Russian; the platform went into detail promising concrete support for Ukraine including the delivery of specific high-tech weaponry. Trump wanted the platform softened to back off from its pro-Ukraine position, promising only a vague statement of general support for Ukraine. Trump's representatives told Republicans that Trump didn't want to fight World War III over Ukraine, and wanted a general attitude of greater cooperation with Russia.

"Ukraine? That's all he wants? Sure, why not?"

In fact,  Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, had for years been a special advisor to Viktor Yanukovych, a corrupt Russian stooge who was president of Ukraine. A revolution took place in Ukraine, and Yanukovych fled to Russia after the election of Volodomyr Zelenskyy in 2019.

In 2016, Manafort was trying to arrange a cozy little relationship between Trump, Yanukovych, and Putin, with a corrupt Russia-friendly government in Ukraine.  

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the Ukrainian people today. The current moment, he said, is “one of the most difficult” for the country. “Ukraine may soon face an extremely difficult choice. Either the loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner. Either 28 complicated points or the hardest winter yet—and the risks that follow,” Zelensky said. 
Zelensky’s use of the word “dignity” recalled Ukraine’s 2014 “Revolution of Dignity” that ousted Russian-aligned president Viktor Yanukovych and turned the country toward Europe. 
Zelensky was responding to a 28-point “peace” plan President Donald J. Trump is pressuring him to sign before Thanksgiving, November 27. The plan appears to have been leaked to Barak Ravid of Axios by Kirill Dmitriev, a top ally of Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, and reports say it was worked out by Dmitriev and Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff. Ukrainian representatives and representatives from Europe were not included. Laura Kelly of The Hill reported on Wednesday that Congress was blindsided by the proposal, which Mark Toth and Jonathan Sweet of The Hill suggest Russia may be pushing now to take advantage of a corruption scandal roiling Ukraine’s government. 
Luke Harding of The Guardian noted that the plan appears to have been translated from Russian, as many of the phrases in the text read naturally in that language but are awkward and clunky in English. 
The plan is a Russian wish list. It begins by confirming Ukraine’s sovereignty, a promise Russia gave Ukraine in 1994 in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons but then broke when it invaded Ukraine in 2014. 
The plan gives Crimea and most of the territory in Ukraine’s four eastern oblasts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk to Russia, and it limits the size of the Ukrainian military. 
It erases any and all accountability for the Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians, including well-documented rape, torture, and murder. It says: “All parties involved in this conflict will receive full amnesty for their actions during the war and agree not to make any claims or consider any complaints in the future.” 
It calls for $100 billion in frozen Russian assets to be invested in rebuilding and developing Ukraine. Since the regions that need reconstruction are the ones Russia would be taking, this means that Russian assets would go back to Russia. The deal says that Europe, which was not consulted, will unfreeze Russian assets and itself add another $100 billion to the reconstruction fund. The plan says the U.S. “will receive 50 percent of the profits from this venture,” which appears to mean that Europe will foot the bill for the reconstruction of Ukraine—Russia, if the plan goes through—and the U.S. and Russia will split the proceeds. 
The plan asserts that “Russia will be reintegrated into the global economy,” with sanctions lifted and an invitation to rejoin the Group of Seven (G7), an informal group of countries with advanced economies—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, along with the European Union—that meets every year to discuss global issues. Russia was excluded from the group after it invaded Ukraine in 2014, and Putin has wanted back in.  
According to the plan, Russia and “[t]he US will enter into a long-term economic cooperation agreement for mutual development in the areas of energy, natural resources, infrastructure, artificial intelligence, data centres, rare earth metal extraction projects in the Arctic, and other mutually beneficial corporate opportunities.”  
The plan requires Ukraine to amend its constitution to reject membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It says “[a] dialogue will be held between Russia and NATO, mediated by the US, to resolve all security issues and create conditions for de-escalation to ensure global security and increase opportunities for cooperation and future economic development.” 
Not only does this agreement sell out Ukraine and Europe for the benefit of Russia—which attacked Ukraine—it explicitly separates the U.S. from NATO, a long-time goal of Russia’s president Vladimir Putin.  
NATO grew out of the 1941 Atlantic Charter. Months before the U.S. entered World War II, U.S. president Franklin Delano Roosevelt and British prime minister Winston Churchill and their advisors laid out principles for an international system that could prevent future world wars. They agreed that countries should not invade each other and therefore the world should work toward disarmament, and that international cooperation and trade thanks to freedom of the seas would help to knit the world together with rising prosperity and human rights.  
The war killed about 36.5 million Europeans, 19 million of them civilians, and left many of those who had survived homeless or living in refugee camps. In its wake, communism backed by the Soviet Union began to push east into Europe. In 1949, France, the U.K., Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg formed a military and economic alliance, the Western Union, to work together, but nations understood that resisting Soviet aggression, preventing the revival of European militarism, and guaranteeing international cooperation would require a transatlantic security agreement.  
In 1949 the countries of the Western Union joined with the U.S., Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland to make up the twelve original signatories to the North Atlantic Treaty. In it, the countries reaffirmed “their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments” and their determination “to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law.”  
They vowed that any attack on one of the signatories would be considered an attack on all, thus deterring war by promising strong retaliation. This system of collective defense has stabilized the world for 75 years. Thirty-two countries are now members, sharing intelligence, training, tactics, equipment, and agreements for use of airspace and bases. In 2024, NATO countries reaffirmed their commitment and said Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had “gravely undermined global security.”  
They did so in the face of Russian aggression.  
Putin invaded Crimea in 2014 after Ukrainians ousted Yanukovych, earning economic sanctions and expulsion from what was then the G8. But Crimea wasn’t enough: he wanted Ukraine’s eastern oblasts, the country’s industrial heartland. Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, who was running for the U.S. presidency against Donald Trump in 2016, would never stand for that land grab. But Trump was a different story.  
According to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 2019 report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, in summer 2016, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort discussed with his business partner, Russian operative Konstantin Kilimnik, “a ‘backdoor’ means for Russia to control eastern Ukraine.” According to the Republican-dominated Senate Intelligence Committee, the plan was for Trump to say he wanted peace in Ukraine and for him to appoint Manafort to be a “special representative” to manage the process. With the cooperation of Russian and Russian-backed Ukrainian officials, Manafort would help create “an autonomous republic” in Ukraine’s industrialized eastern region and would work to have Russian-backed Yanukovych, for whom Manafort had worked previously, “elected to head that republic.”  
According to the Senate Intelligence Committee, the men continued to work on what they called the “Mariupol Plan” at least until 2018. Putin has been determined to control that land ever since. And now it appears Russia is pushing Trump to deliver it. 
This plan, complete with its suggestion that the U.S. is no longer truly a part of NATO but can broker between NATO and Russia, would replace the post–World War II rules-based international order with a new version of an older order. In the world before NATO and the other international institutions that were created after World War II, powerful countries dominated smaller countries, which had to do as their powerful neighbors demanded in order to survive.

Thursday, November 20, 2025

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Caitlin!

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Election Day, 2025: Democrats blow them out of the water.

November 4, 2025, was a great election day for Democrats; Republicans were soundly defeated all over the map. While the mainstream media concentrated on the big, high-profile elections, there were many, many other Democratic victories.

 Here's an excerpt from Heather Cox Richardson's blog, Letters from an American, for November 4:

Tonight the results came in. American voters have spoken.

Democrat Abigail Spanberger won the governorship of Virginia by 15 points, becoming Virginia’s first female governor. Every single county in Virginia moved toward the Democrats, who appear to have picked up at least 12 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates. Democrat Mikie Sherrill won the governorship of New Jersey by more than ten points (the vote counts are still coming in as I write this).

Pennsylvania voted to retain three state supreme court justices, preserving a 5–2 liberal majority on the court. Democrats in Georgia flipped two statewide seats for public service commissioners by double digits. Mississippi broke the Republican supermajority in the state senate.

Maine voters rejected an attempt to restrict mail-in voting; Colorado voters chose to raise taxes on households with incomes over $300,000 to pay for meals for public school students.

California voters approved Proposition 50 by a margin of about 2 to 1, making it hard for Trump to maintain the vote was illegitimate.

And in New York City, voters elected Zohran Mamdani mayor.

Tonight, legal scholar John Pfaff wrote: “Every race. It’s basically been every race. Governors. Mayors. Long-held [Republican] dog-catchers. School boards. Water boards. Flipped a dungeon master in a rural Iowa D&D club. State senators. State reps. A janitor in Duluth. State justices. Three [Republican] Uber drivers. Just everything.”

Trump posted on social media: “‘TRUMP WASN’T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WERE THE TWO REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT,’ according to Pollsters.”

But in fact, today voters resoundingly rejected Trump and Trumpism, and tomorrow, politics will be a whole different game.

 

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Trump: Let them eat cake.

 On Halloween night, Trump threw a lavish party at Mar-a-Lago with a Great Gatsby theme. The Great Gatsby, of course, set during the Roaring Twenties, was F. Scott Fitzgerald's picture of the moral decadence of the very rich -- what a theme for a party when 42 million of the lowest-income Americans are about to lose SNAP benefits that Trump's administration is withholding.

For those who haven't read the book, I asked ChatGPT to summarize it.

Summary of The Great Gatsby

The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald and published in 1925, is a novel set in the Roaring Twenties, a time of wealth, excess, and social upheaval in America. The story is narrated by Nick Carraway, a young man from Minnesota who moves to West Egg, Long Island, to learn the bond business. His neighbor, Jay Gatsby, is a mysterious and fabulously wealthy man known for throwing lavish parties. As Nick becomes drawn into Gatsby’s world, he learns that Gatsby’s wealth and lifestyle exist for one purpose: to win back Daisy Buchanan, Nick’s cousin, whom Gatsby loved before she married the wealthy but unfaithful Tom Buchanan.

Through Gatsby’s obsessive pursuit of Daisy, the novel explores themes of love, illusion, class, and the corrupting influence of money. Gatsby’s dream of recreating the past and achieving happiness through wealth ultimately proves impossible. When Daisy accidentally kills a woman named Myrtle Wilson in a car accident, Gatsby takes the blame. Myrtle’s husband, misled by Tom, kills Gatsby and then himself. In the end, Daisy retreats into her world of privilege, untouched by the destruction around her. Disillusioned by the moral emptiness of the wealthy, Nick returns to the Midwest.

At its core, The Great Gatsby is about the American Dream—its promise and its failure. Gatsby embodies the dreamer who believes that through determination and material success, he can transform himself and attain happiness. Yet Fitzgerald reveals the dream’s darker side: beneath the glitter of the Jazz Age lies moral decay and the impossibility of recapturing an idealized past. The novel is both a portrait of an era and a timeless meditation on ambition, love, and illusion.

Trump is no longer even trying to conceal his contempt for ordinary Americans. Paul Krugman says that too many commentators are brushing this off as being "tone deaf"; Krugman says no, Trump knows that he is rubbing people's faces  in it and taking pleasure in doing so. He posted in his article entitled "The Great Smirk":

During Trump’s first term Adam Serwer wrote a justly celebrated article for The Atlantic titled “The cruelty is the point.” He argued that cruelty, and the joy some people take from inflicting cruelty, are what bind Trump’s most loyal supporters to him:

Trump’s only true skill is the con; his only fundamental belief is that the United States is the birthright of straight, white, Christian men, and his only real, authentic pleasure is in cruelty. It is that cruelty, and the delight it brings them, that binds his most ardent supporters to him, in shared scorn for those they hate and fear: immigrants, black voters, feminists, and treasonous white men who empathize with any of those who would steal their birthright. The president’s ability to execute that cruelty through word and deed makes them euphoric. It makes them feel good, it makes them feel proud, it makes them feel happy, it makes them feel united.

 Further, Krugman says in his article: 

So, to repeat, the party at Mar a Lago wasn’t a case of tone deafness, living it up despite others’ suffering. It was in large part a party held to celebrate others’ suffering.

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Frances Perkins

She watched 146 women burn to death because factory owners locked the exits.
Twelve years later, she became the most powerful woman in America.
As a girl, Frances Perkins couldn't understand why good people lived in poverty.
Her father said the poor were lazy or weak.
Frances, even then, knew that couldn't be true.
At Mount Holyoke College, she studied physics—safe, respectable, appropriate for a young woman. Then came a class trip that changed everything. Her professor took students to tour factories along the Connecticut River.
Frances saw exhausted girls younger than herself bent over machines in rooms with no windows, no ventilation, no exits. Twelve-hour shifts. Six-day weeks. Fingers lost to machinery. Lungs destroyed by cotton dust.
She realized knowledge meant nothing if it didn't help people live with dignity.
She abandoned the safe path—marriage to a suitable man, teaching piano to rich children. Instead, she earned a master's degree at Columbia University in economics and sociology, writing her thesis on malnutrition in Hell's Kitchen.
Her family was horrified. Nice girls didn't study poverty. They certainly didn't live in settlement houses with immigrants.
Frances didn't care what nice girls did.
By 1910, she was Executive Secretary of the New York Consumers League, investigating factories, documenting violations, pushing for reform. Clean bakeries. Safe exits. Maximum working hours. She testified before legislative committees, a young woman in a tailored suit telling powerful men their factories were killing people.
They hated her. She didn't stop.
Then came March 25, 1911.
Frances was having tea with friends in Washington Square when she heard the fire bells. She followed the smoke to the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory—ten stories of flame and screaming.
She stood on the street and watched young women jump from ninth-floor windows because the factory owners had locked the doors to prevent "theft" and "unauthorized breaks." Their bodies hit the pavement like thunder. Again and again and again.
146 workers died. Most were immigrant women and girls. Some as young as 14. They'd been making shirtwaists—the fashionable blouses wealthy women wore to demonstrate their modernity and independence.
Frances watched them burn so rich women could look progressive.
She made herself a promise that day: Their deaths will not be in vain.
Within weeks, Frances was appointed to the committee investigating the fire. She didn't just write a report. She rewrote New York's labor laws from the ground up.
Fire exits—unlocked, accessible, clearly marked.
Maximum occupancy limits.
Sprinkler systems.
Regular safety inspections.
54-hour maximum workweek.
One day off per week.
The factory owners fought every provision. They called it "government overreach." They said it would destroy business. They said workers were trying to get something for nothing.
Frances responded with photographs of the Triangle dead. With testimony from survivors. With cold economic data showing that safe workplaces were more productive, not less.
New York passed the laws. Other states followed. Within a decade, American workplaces had been transformed—not completely, not perfectly, but irreversibly.
And Frances Perkins became the most hated woman in industrial America.
Business groups called her a communist. Newspapers mocked her as an "old maid" meddling in men's affairs. (She'd married late, to an economist who suffered from mental illness—a fact she kept private to protect him from institutionalization.)
She absorbed the hatred and kept working.
In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt—newly elected president facing the Great Depression—asked Frances to join his Cabinet as Secretary of Labor.
She was 53 years old. No woman had ever served in a presidential Cabinet. The idea was considered radical, possibly unconstitutional, definitely improper.
Frances said she'd do it—but only on her terms.
She handed Roosevelt a list of demands:
A 40-hour workweek
A minimum wage
Abolition of child labor
Unemployment insurance
Old-age pensions
Roosevelt looked at the list. "You know this is impossible."
"Then find someone else," Frances said.
Roosevelt appointed her anyway.
For twelve years—longer than any other Labor Secretary in history—Frances Perkins fought for those "impossible" demands. And she won most of them.
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: 40-hour workweek, minimum wage, child labor restrictions.
The Social Security Act of 1935: old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, support for dependent children.
The laws weren't perfect. They excluded agricultural and domestic workers—a compromise Frances hated but accepted to get anything passed. Those exclusions meant most Black workers weren't covered, a racial injustice that wouldn't be corrected for decades.
But millions of workers—mostly white, yes, but millions nonetheless—gained protections that had never existed before.
Frances was never satisfied. She wanted more. She fought for universal healthcare (failed). She fought for broader coverage (partially succeeded). She fought against every senator and congressman who tried to water down protections.
They called her pushy. Difficult. Unwomanly.
She wore the same black dress and tricorn hat to every public appearance—a uniform that said I'm not here to be decorative. I'm here to work.
When Roosevelt died in 1945, Frances resigned. She'd been in the Cabinet for twelve years—the longest-serving Labor Secretary in American history, male or female.
She could have retired wealthy and celebrated. Instead, she taught labor history at Cornell, writing and lecturing until her death in 1965 at age 85.
Most people don't remember her name.
But every time you get paid overtime, that's Frances Perkins.
Every time a workplace has a clearly marked fire exit, that's Frances Perkins.
Every time someone collects Social Security or unemployment insurance, that's Frances Perkins.
Every weekend you have off, that's Frances Perkins.
She stood on a street in 1911 and watched 146 women die because profit mattered more than human life.
And she spent the next fifty years making sure that would never be true again—at least not legally, not without consequence, not without someone powerful enough to fight back.
She didn't just witness injustice. She built the architecture that made justice possible.
Her father said the poor were lazy or weak.
Frances proved that poverty was a policy choice—and policy could be changed.
She was the first woman in a presidential Cabinet. But that's not why she mattered.
She mattered because she looked at burning women and said never again—and then spent her life making that promise real.
Most people don't know her name.
But every person who's ever received a paycheck with overtime pay, every child who went to school instead of a factory, every elderly person who retired with dignity—they're living in the world Frances Perkins built.
One fire. 146 deaths. Fifty years of fighting.
And a country that learned, slowly and incompletely but irreversibly, that workers are human beings who deserve to live.