Pages

Thursday, January 8, 2026

More Trump theft.

Click here for Paul Krugman's January 8 Substack post, entitled "The Looting of US Foreign Policy," subtitled "Goodbye, national interest. Hello, ego gratification and profits for the ruling clique" -- which he defines later in the article as "the Trump family and its hangers-on."

 He begins with:

While I was working on this, ICE murdered a woman in Minneapolis. I’m still going to put up the originally planned post, but like every decent American I’m having a hard time thinking about anything else right now. 

Exactly, Paul.

He's referring to a Truth Social post by Trump saying that he will take 30-50 million barrels of oil  from Venezuela. He says "This Oil will be sold at its market Price, and that money will be controlled by me" -- he adds "to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States!" Yeah, fat chance.

This will be in the range of $2 billion; less than .01 percent of the U.S. GDP; "in terms of U.S. oil consumption, that's about 2 days' worth of oil. " Krugman says this is trivial from the perspective of national interest, but it's a fairly big number to "the clique that is currently running the U.S. government" -- the Trump family and its hangers-on:

Trumpist foreign policy has nothing to do with, well, making America great again, and everything to do with raising the wealth and status of the Trump family and its hangers-on — what they call our ruling clique.
When it comes to Trump's threats against Canada and Greenland/Denmark, Krugman says "the Trump clique doesn’t care whether nations have been staunch allies of the United States. They want subservient clients paying tribute, not to America, but to them personally. And that’s something democracies like Canada and Denmark won’t do."

He then says:

Trump has been remarkably transparent about his goals in Venezuela: It’s all about looting. That is, he wants to seize the country’s oil wealth on behalf of himself and his clique. [The hyperlink connects with an article in Popular Information about, among other things, Trump-supporting billionaire, investor Paul Singer, who in November bought Citgo, the U.S.-based subsidiary of Venezuela's state-run oil company.] Some people, notably María Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela’s opposition, have been surprised that Trump shows no interest in restoring democracy. But why would he? He’s unable to enrich himself personally in democracies like Canada and Denmark. But a repressive regime like Venezuela is willing to pay him protection money.

He finishes:

The bottom line is that to understand what Trump is doing around the world you must disabuse yourself of the notion that any of it is about serving America. It’s all about glorifying himself and enriching his clique. 

 

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

"Trump has gone completely mad."

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry for January 7, detailing the murder of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good by an ICE officer in Minneapolis.

 It's a very sad story. In short, Ms. Good was murdered, and  Kristi Noem and Donald Trump are blatantly lying about it, saying she had weaponized her vehicle in an attempt to run over and kill the agent. There were numerous videos taken -- as is and will be the case with a lot of ICE attacks -- and they exonerate Good of any such attempt.

That both DHS and Trump posted false accounts of the shooting even as there are four videos circulating that reveal those accounts to be lies shows they no longer are making any attempt to justify their actions. Instead, they are demanding Americans abandon reality in favor of whatever the administration says. If this works, it would be a demonstration of totalitarian power, the ability to control how people think. Accepting that lie is a loyalty test. 

There's a lot more reporting on the murder, and her diary closes with three financial moves that Trump quietly made today (well, the increase of the military's budget from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion wasn't quiet). 

Her article closes:

Simon Rosenberg of The Hopium Chronicles wrote: “Trump has gone completely mad.”

We're in dangerous, dangerous days, folks. 

 

State of the union: indescribable

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry for January 6, 2026.

It's a wide-ranging condemnation of Donald Trump's actions: threatening to cancel elections, rewriting history and reversing the events of January 6, 2021, claiming that the demonstrators were peaceful and that the real villains were “the Democrats who staged the real insurrection by certifying a fraud-ridden election, ignoring widespread irregularities, and weaponizing federal agencies to hunt down dissenters.” 

She says:

As Biden prepared to leave office in January 2025, Trump claimed that the U.S. was in freefall, “a disaster, a laughing stock all over the World!” But Peter Baker reported in the New York Times that the opposite was true: Biden and his administration were leaving behind a country that was in the best shape it had been since at least 2000.

Trump claims that Biden had destroyed the U.S. economy. Peter Baker in The New York Times quoted chief economist of Moody’s Analytics Mark Zandi, who said back in 2021: “President Trump is inheriting an economy that is about as good as it ever gets.” 

Trump is threatening Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, Greenland, and Canada, and extending his threats beyond the Western Hemisphere to Iran. 

In Venezuela, the U.S. took Maduro and Flores but rather than supporting the actual winner of the 2024 presidential election, Edmundo González, or opposition leader María Corina Machado, the administration left the Maduro government in place, led by former vice president Delcy Rodríguez.

María Luisa Paúl reported in the Washington Post today that in the hours since Maduro’s removal, the Venezuelan government has cracked down on those showing support for the U.S. operation. It detained at least 14 journalists, sent armed gangs into the capital, restricted protests, and arrested citizens who appeared to be “involved in promoting or supporting the armed attack by the United States of America.”

 Finally:

This evening, Trump’s social media account posted: “I am pleased to announce that the interim Authorities in Venezuela will be turning over between 30 and 50 MILLION Barrels of High Quality, Sanctioned Oil, to the United States of America. This Oil will be sold at its Market Price, and that money will be controlled by me, as President of the United States of America, to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States! I have asked Energy Secretary Chris Wright to execute this plan, immediately. It will be taken by storage ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.” 

Lovely. 30 to 50 million barrels of stolen Venezuelan oil are to be directed into a slush fund controlled by him, personally.

When's the State of the Union address? I can't wait to see how he describes this dumpster fire. 

My, my; how things change.

 This was an op ed by Scott Jennings, published by CNN on January 6, 2021:

"This is literally an insurrection. The fact that the US military hasn’t secured the seat of our government already is a failure of leadership by the commander in chief. 

"President Donald Trump caused this insurrection with his lies and conspiracy theories about the election process being rigged against him. It was not stolen, but this madness was fomented by the President and his top advisers over the past several months. His attorney Rudy Giuliani, at a rally on Wednesday, called for “trial by combat” to a roaring crowd. 

"Let me be clear: These rioters are not Republicans. These are not conservatives. These are not patriots bursting into the US Capitol, accosting police officers and destroying public property."

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

January 6, 2026 -- is the American Experiment over?

Click here for a post on Substack by Steven Beschloss entitled "Snapshot: Accountability and Telling the Truth." It's his summary of the events of January 6, 2021.

He includes a quote from Mitch McConnell, Republican Senate Majority Leader at the time, who said:

January 6 was a disgrace. American citizens attacked their own government. They used terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of domestic business they did not like. Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the vice president.

They did this because they’d been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth, because he was angry he’d lost an election. Former President Trump’s actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty…There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day, no question about it.

The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. And having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole, which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth…

The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.

McConnell is a swine who will go down in history as one of the worst of the worst, chief enabler of the Republican party as it made its disastrous transition to MAGA. But he spoke the truth that day.

I watched the events of that day, and I saw the crowd beating whatever Capitol police they could isolate and surround, baying for blood, chanting about Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence. 

Donald Trump is making an all-out effort to reverse popular thinking about what happened on that day. Who are you going to believe, him or your lying eyes? Anyway, if Trump and MAGA get their way, the U.S. will no longer be celebrating July 4th as Independence Day; it will be replaced by January 6. That will be the day that MAGA celebrate their freedom. Lies, lies, lies -- they are flooding the media with their warped revisionist views.

Stephen Miller, who many say is the gray eminence behind the scenes, has gone full-on Nazi.Unless Trump and MAGA can be defeated -- wiped out -- the American experiment is over. It failed. 

 

 

 

It's no longer the rule of law; it's the rule of power.

Bear in mind, some say Stephen Miller is the real power behind the throne; he directs what Trump says and does. Heather Cox Richardson added: "Today, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper: 'We live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power,' he said. 'These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.'” It's a new world, folks.

There's the Gettysburg address, and then there's this.

 This is Donald Trump doing his mock weightlifting shtick. Note the elegant prose:

And my wife -- by the way, my wife hates when I do this. She said -- you know, she's a very classy person, right? She said, "It's so unpresidential." I said, "But I did become president." 

She -- somebody -- she hates when I dance. I said, "Everybody wants me to dance." "Darling, it's not presidential." She actually said, "Could you imagine FDR dancing?" She said that to me. 

And I said -- there's a long history that perhaps she doesn't know, because he was an elegant fellow, even as a Democrat, right? He was -- the attack by Japan. You know, he was quite elegant. But he wouldn't be doing this. But -- but nor would too many others. 

But she says, "Darling, please, the weightlifting is terrible." 

And I have to say this, "The dancing, they really like." She said, "They don't like it. They're just being nice to you." 

I said, "That's not right. The place goes crazy. They're screaming, 'Dance, please.'" 

But the weightlifting -- but no, they go, gets up, and -- (mimes weightlifting) and you see, I want to be more -- but I have somebody watching. I want to be more effusive. I want to really (pants and grunts, miming weightlifting) -- yeah. 

But she gets it. Dropped the thing, walks off the stage, crying. Her mother's crying, her father's crying.  Guy gets up. He said, "Have you lifted before?" "A little bit." 

And he walks up, bing (mimes weightlifting) -- he could have gone, ding, ding, ding. I think it was 112 pounds, right? It's crazy.

For the beautiful boxer -- they have boxing now, and they have a young gentleman who transitioned. He was a very good boxer, but he wanted to be a woman, which is, you know, to each his own. Because I want to be very liberal when it comes to these subjects. I'm trying to get that vote. It's not an easy vote to get. It's very tough for me to get it. 

But he transitioned, and he's -- he transitioned. And the girl was a champion boxer, from Italy, remember? She got up, first round. He hit her, "Pum," (mimes a punch) with a left. A left, for those -- everybody knows, but -- but a left -- Lisa knows better than anybody. But a left is defense. 

He goes, "Pum." (mimes a punch) She's like, "Oh, my God." 

She walked to the corner, remember? She didn't go down, but she did everything else. But she said, "I've never been hit like that before. I don't want to go out again." 

"You can do it. You can do it." Bing. (mimes a punch) She walked off. She said, "That's..." 

He happened to win the gold medal, that young woman. He won the gold medal. There were two transition people; they both won gold medals. 

The whole thing is ridiculous. You have policy on your side. They don't have policy on your side. Right?  You have policy.

This doddering old fool has his finger on the nuclear button. Be afraid. Be very afraid. 



 

Monday, January 5, 2026

China's great! The people are so united!

Here's a post on Truth (?) Social from that esteemed thinker, Donald J. Trump:

China is a VERY unified country. People don't like to admit it. Tremendous UNITY. Why? Simple. One VOTE. ONE. President Xi VOTES. Everybody RESPECTS it. Everyone else RELAXES. Goes home. No CHAOS. No complaints. No endless COMMENT SECTIONS from people who don't understand ANYTHING. Beautiful. Absolutely BEAUTIFUL. Here? People arguing on phones at 2 A.M. Very late. Very angry. Posting nonsense. Sad! People ask me, "Sir, shouldn't there be MORE voices?" WRONG. Too many voices. Very confusing. Very BAD for decision-making. Very UNFAIR to Americans. China doesn't ask 330 MILLION people how they FEEL about MATH. They accept their leader KNOWS what works. I know what works. I've PROVEN it. Again and again. Everyone knows it. Don't worry, LOYAL patriots. Change is COMING. BIG change. Thank you for your ATTENTION to this matter. 

Dear God, make it stop. 

Pete Hegseth disgraces himself; Caring Guy responds

Here is a Twitter post from the totally incompetent Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth: Here is the response from Captain Mark Kelly: And here is the response from the Twitter hero, "Caring Guy":

Thursday, January 1, 2026

"Caring Guy" responds to Republican attacks on Twitter

 Stephen Miller tweeted: "The Refugee Act of 1980 has been one of the gravest historical calamities. It flooded America with “refugees,” from the world’s failed societies, created a vast federally-funded NGO network to support them, granted uncapped welfare, and created a fast-track to citizenship."

Caring Guy responded: "Actually, you have been one of the greatest historical calamities. Of course you don't know what you're talking about, so here I'll help you. 

You're wrong on the law, wrong on the facts, and wrong on history. 

The Refugee Act of 1980 did not “flood America” with refugees. It created, for the first time, a numerical cap on refugee admissions and placed that cap under annual presidential and congressional control. Before 1980, refugee admissions were handled ad hoc through Cold War era parole authority with far less structure or oversight. The Act reduced chaos, it did not create it. 

It did not create uncapped welfare. Refugees are eligible for limited, time bound assistance, generally eight months of Refugee Cash Assistance and access to the same means tested programs as other lawful residents if they qualify. There is no special, unlimited welfare category for refugees. Every dollar is appropriated by Congress annually and audited. Claims of “uncapped welfare” are simply false. 

It did not create a fast track to citizenship. Refugees must wait one year to apply for lawful permanent resident status and then wait the same statutory period as other green card holders, typically five years, before applying for citizenship. There is no shortcut. There is no bypass of the naturalization process. Refugees face some of the most extensive background checks in the entire immigration system. 

*****

 

Medical bankruptcies

The Minnesota child care "fraud"

Republicans are all worked up about Minnesota child care fraud, all because of a YouTube spot by a malicious young punk named Nick Shirley. A guy on Twitter who goes by the handle of "Caring Guy" has written a bunch of excellent tweets on a wide range of subjects responding to MAGA attacks; here are three concerning the Minnesota "scandal" (lightly edited by me):

1. Nick Shirley was not some brave independent investigator. He was a front man working with the GOP while being presented as neutral. That alone matters when his claims were used to accuse entire communities and political opponents. 

And his “evidence” completely collapsed on camera. He pointed to daycare doors being locked, which is not suspicious; it is literally what the law requires to protect children. When asked to back up his fraud numbers, he admitted he could not cite where they came from. Not an audit, not a charging document, not a court filing, nothing. 

The daycare has since produced video showing how his footage was selectively edited and misrepresented. He did not expose anything new. He repackaged investigations that had already been underway for years and added made up numbers for outrage. 

Blame Democrats? Democrats were the ones auditing, investigating, charging, and convicting people in Minnesota for more than two years. Over 100 people charged and dozens convicted does not happen when people are looking the other way. 

The real irony is watching people cheer “accountability” from an administration led by the convicted felon, a man with 34 felony fraud convictions, a fake university that paid $25 million for fraud, a business found liable for fraud in New York, and a charity scheme so fraudulent his family was barred from running charities. 

So what is this terrible revelation? A GOP coordinated influencer, no real evidence, locked doors passed off as scandal, numbers pulled from thin air, and a narrative that collapsed the moment anyone asked basic questions.

2. The fraud you are talking about was identified, audited, investigated, charged, and prosecuted over multiple years, with more than 100 people charged and dozens convicted. That did not happen by accident and it did not happen because Republicans suddenly showed up. It happened because state and federal investigators did their jobs. 

There was no pause, no cover up, and no fear of telling the public. The cases were public, the charges were public, the convictions were public, and the investigations have been ongoing for years. Enforcement was already happening long before Republicans decided to turn it into a talking point. 

What Republicans actually did was coordinate with a YouTuber, present him as an independent investigator when he was not, and try to repackage years-old investigations as breaking news. When pressed for evidence of anything new, his answer was that daycare front doors were locked, which is a legal requirement, and he cited dollar figures he could not source or explain. 

Fraud should be prosecuted, and people should go to jail. Great. That has already been happening. If you think that Democrats ignored billions in fraud while Republicans heroically rode in to save the day, that is nonsense. It's political theater layered on top of work that was already being done. 

3. Minnesota law requires daycare doors to be locked during operating hours. That is not suspicious behavior, it is a safety requirement to prevent unauthorized access to children. Walking up to a locked daycare door with a phone camera does not show fraud, it shows compliance. 

The GOP’s self admitted front man in this stunt, nick shirley, filmed outside facilities at arbitrary times and then implied emptiness meant no children existed. That implication collapses the moment you add context. Security footage released by the centers shows children being dropped off and picked up before and after his visit. Parents, kids, staff, all on camera. That directly contradicts the narrative he tried to sell. 

Reporters did what viral outrage merchants refuse to do, they verified. Journalists from the Star Tribune and local TV stations physically went inside the same daycare centers shown in the video and observed children and staff present during normal hours. That is not “don’t believe your eyes,” that is “don’t let a selectively edited clip replace basic verification.” 

This also was not newly discovered fraud. Issues with childcare and nonprofit fraud in Minnesota were identified, audited, and referred for prosecution years ago under Tim Walz’s administration, with federal authorities involved. Pretending a YouTuber uncovered some hidden conspiracy is revisionist nonsense. 

What people are actually being asked to believe is that locked doors required by law somehow prove a crime, while documented security footage, active licenses, inspections, and on site reporting should be ignored. That is not skepticism, that is confirmation bias.

After Shirley posted another video, Caring Guy replied:

4. GOP-backed Nick, you cut the video precisely where the facts stop helping your narrative. The Minnesota commissioner did not say the center was permanently shut down for fraud. She was describing a temporary licensing or status change, which happens routinely during compliance reviews, corrective action periods, or administrative transitions. You edited the clip to imply a final closure, when that is not what she said. That is not investigative journalism, it is omission by design. 

Receiving $1.9 million in a fiscal year is not proof of fraud. Child care assistance payments are volume based, spread across multiple funding streams, tied to enrollment, attendance, and subsidy eligibility. A center licensed for around 90 children can reach that dollar amount over a year without anything illegal occurring, especially when serving subsidized families. Big numbers sound shocking only when you refuse to explain how the program actually works. 

Locked doors, controlled entry, and sign in procedures are required by Minnesota child care law. You keep filming locked doors as if they are evidence of a crime. They are evidence of compliance. Every licensed daycare in the state is supposed to restrict access for child safety. This has already been explained to you repeatedly. 

You also misrepresented the federal action. The Department of Health and Human Services did not declare that Minnesota daycares committed fraud and then freeze funds as punishment. HHS imposed additional verification and documentation requirements while audits continue, which is a procedural step, not a finding of guilt. Payments resume when documentation is provided, because that is how audits work. Freezing verification pending review is not the same thing as proving fraud. 

 Most importantly, this was not some hidden scandal you uncovered. Minnesota identified child care and nonprofit fraud years ago, audited it, referred cases for prosecution, and involved federal authorities long before your YouTube channel showed up. Pretending you exposed something new is revisionist nonsense.

5. (In reply to Tom Emmer, GOP majority whip, who objected to a video from Minnesota Governor Walz:

Tommy boy, you really think the American people care about your lies? 

You mean another week of you falsely accusing Governor Tim Walz of scamming Minnesota, when the documented record shows the opposite. The fraud you keep referencing was uncovered by state agencies under his administration, referred to law enforcement, and prosecuted in coordination with federal authorities. That is not complicity; that is detection and enforcement. 

The Feeding Our Future scheme was identified by the Minnesota Department of Education starting in 2020 and escalated in 2021 after irregular meal claims were flagged. The state froze payments, referred the matter to prosecutors, and cooperated with a federal investigation that led to one of the largest pandemic fraud cases in the country. That investigation did not originate with outside influencers or partisan outrage posts, it came from auditors and state officials doing their jobs. 

As of the last two years alone, more than 70 individuals have been convicted or pleaded guilty in the case, with dozens more charged and awaiting trial. Federal prosecutors have already recovered hundreds of millions of dollars through forfeitures, restitution orders, and asset seizures, with more still pending. Several defendants received lengthy prison sentences, and additional indictments are ongoing. That is what accountability looks like, not a coverup.

The idea that Walz or his administration “scammed” Minnesota requires believing that state agencies simultaneously uncovered fraud, shut off funding, referred cases to law enforcement, cooperated with federal prosecutors, testified in court, and somehow were secretly running the scheme themselves. That is not a serious claim; it is a talking point that collapses the moment you apply basic causation. 

Under Walz, Minnesota identified the fraud, stopped the payments, brought in the feds, and prosecuted the criminals. The people who stole the money are being sentenced. The state that uncovered the crime is not the criminal. 

If you are looking for someone to be mad at, try the people who committed the fraud, not the administration that exposed it.  

 

So why not have the voter ID requirements Republicans are asking for?

Click "Show More."

Smith v. Trump; qualifications compared

Be sure to click "Show More."

Trump investigating 2020 election fraud! (Needless to say ...)

Click "Show More"!

Excerpt from President Zelenskyy's New Year's Address

“Let's start with the most important. What does Ukraine want? Peace? Yes. At any cost? No. We want the war to end, but not Ukraine. Are we tired? Very much so. Does this mean we're ready to surrender? Anyone who thinks that is deeply mistaken. They clearly still don't understand who Ukrainians are after all these years: A people enduring 1,407 days of full-scale war. Just consider those numbers. That's longer than Nazi occupation of many cities in World War II. 1,407 days of undefeated Ukraine, spending nights in shelters, fighting daily, often without electricity or sleep, many days at the front lines. But always without panic, chaos, or division - united for peace. Do we want the war to end? Absolutely. Why hasn't this happened yet? The answer lies with our neighbor. Can Russia end the war? Yes. Do they want to? No.” 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his New Year’s address, Wed, Dec 31, 2025

"A classic example of divide and conquer."

Reinier van Lanschot, Dutch politician and a Member of the European Parliament:

"What do Trump, Putin, Xi, and the tech autocrats have in common? They are all afraid of a united Europe. And that's why they want to destroy it. The US National Security Strategy says out loud what we have known for years: they want a Europe of 27 weak nations. A classic example of divide and conquer."

Jack Smith's testimony: devastating for Trump

Jack Smith was Special Counsel for President Biden's Department of Justice, overseeing criminal investigations of Donald Trump regarding Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol attack and his mishandling of classified government documents, both of which were dropped when Trump was reelected president. Trump's DOJ opened an investigation of Smith, alleging his actions had been politically motivated.

The House Judiciary Committee recently deposed Smith. Smith asked that his deposition be conducted in public, but the committee instead held the proceedings behind closed doors. Transcript and video of the deposition has just been released. 

I asked ChatGPT: The House Judiciary committee has released special counsel Jack Smith's 255-page deposition. The contents seem highly unfavorable for Trump. Why would the committee, chaired by Republican Jim Jordan, do such a thing?

Here's the reply: 

At first glance it does seem counterintuitive for a Republican-led House Judiciary Committee to release material that reflects badly on Donald Trump. But there are several plausible—and not mutually exclusive—reasons why Jim Jordan’s committee would do it anyway.

1. They believe the process matters more than the optics

Jordan’s committee has consistently framed its investigation as being about alleged politicization of the Justice Department, not about protecting Trump personally. From that perspective:

  • Releasing the full deposition supports their claim of transparency.

  • It lets them argue: “We’re not selectively leaking—read it yourself.”

  • Even unfavorable testimony can be presented as evidence of an overzealous or ideologically driven prosecutor, depending on how Republicans interpret Smith’s answers.

In short, they may believe voters care more about how Trump was investigated than what Smith says about Trump.

2. They assume supporters won’t read 255 pages

This is a very practical political calculation:

  • Most voters—including most Trump supporters—will not read the deposition.

  • What matters is the spin, not the underlying document.

  • Republicans can cherry-pick portions they think help their case (e.g., limits on Smith’s knowledge, reliance on DOJ precedents, internal constraints).

Meanwhile, releasing the full document helps deflect accusations that they are hiding something.

3. Preempting leaks or court-ordered disclosure

Another common motive in congressional investigations:

  • If the deposition was likely to become public anyway—through leaks, FOIA litigation, or court filings—releasing it themselves lets Republicans control the timing and framing.

  • It’s often better politically to say “we released this voluntarily” than to be forced into disclosure later.

4. Institutional interests of Congress

House Judiciary Republicans have been trying to reassert Congress’s authority over DOJ and special counsels generally:

  • Publishing Smith’s testimony creates a public record that can be cited in future legislation or oversight fights.

  • Even damaging testimony can be useful if it shows how much discretion a special counsel has, how decisions were made internally, or how insulated Smith was from political accountability.

From this view, Trump is almost secondary to a longer-term institutional battle.

5. Different Republican factions, different incentives

Not all House Republicans are equally invested in shielding Trump:

  • Some members are more focused on anti-DOJ messaging.

  • Others are positioning themselves as champions of government transparency, regardless of whom it hurts.

  • Jordan himself often prioritizes the fight with federal law enforcement over Trump’s personal legal exposure.

That can lead to decisions that frustrate Trump allies but still make sense within GOP internal politics.

6. Confidence that Trump’s base is immovable

There is also a blunt political reality:

  • Republicans may believe that no testimony—however damaging—will meaningfully erode Trump’s core support.

  • If that’s true, the downside risk of releasing the deposition is low, while the upside (credibility, transparency claims, oversight precedent) is real.


Bottom line

The committee likely calculated that releasing Jack Smith’s deposition:

  • Strengthens their transparency and oversight narrative

  • Helps them in a broader fight with DOJ and special counsels

  • Carries little political risk with Trump’s base

  • Allows Republicans—not Democrats—to control how the document enters the public domain

So even if the substance is unfavorable to Trump, the institutional and political incentives for Jim Jordan’s committee can still point toward disclosure.

 

60 Minutes: Trump government lied in 35+ court cases

The next edition of 60 Minutes after Bari Weiss, editor-in-chief of CBS News, pulled the disgraceful CECOT revelations from the air, contains this gem: