Pages

Thursday, January 1, 2026

The Minnesota child care "fraud"

Republicans are all worked up about Minnesota child care fraud, all because of a YouTube spot by a malicious young punk named Nick Shirley. A guy on Twitter who goes by the handle of "Caring Guy" has written a bunch of excellent tweets on a wide range of subjects responding to MAGA attacks; here are three concerning the Minnesota "scandal" (lightly edited by me):

1. Nick Shirley was not some brave independent investigator. He was a front man working with the GOP while being presented as neutral. That alone matters when his claims were used to accuse entire communities and political opponents. 

And his “evidence” completely collapsed on camera. He pointed to daycare doors being locked, which is not suspicious; it is literally what the law requires to protect children. When asked to back up his fraud numbers, he admitted he could not cite where they came from. Not an audit, not a charging document, not a court filing, nothing. 

The daycare has since produced video showing how his footage was selectively edited and misrepresented. He did not expose anything new. He repackaged investigations that had already been underway for years and added made up numbers for outrage. 

Blame Democrats? Democrats were the ones auditing, investigating, charging, and convicting people in Minnesota for more than two years. Over 100 people charged and dozens convicted does not happen when people are looking the other way. 

The real irony is watching people cheer “accountability” from an administration led by the convicted felon, a man with 34 felony fraud convictions, a fake university that paid $25 million for fraud, a business found liable for fraud in New York, and a charity scheme so fraudulent his family was barred from running charities. 

So what is this terrible revelation? A GOP coordinated influencer, no real evidence, locked doors passed off as scandal, numbers pulled from thin air, and a narrative that collapsed the moment anyone asked basic questions.

2. The fraud you are talking about was identified, audited, investigated, charged, and prosecuted over multiple years, with more than 100 people charged and dozens convicted. That did not happen by accident and it did not happen because Republicans suddenly showed up. It happened because state and federal investigators did their jobs. 

There was no pause, no cover up, and no fear of telling the public. The cases were public, the charges were public, the convictions were public, and the investigations have been ongoing for years. Enforcement was already happening long before Republicans decided to turn it into a talking point. 

What Republicans actually did was coordinate with a YouTuber, present him as an independent investigator when he was not, and try to repackage years-old investigations as breaking news. When pressed for evidence of anything new, his answer was that daycare front doors were locked, which is a legal requirement, and he cited dollar figures he could not source or explain. 

Fraud should be prosecuted, and people should go to jail. Great. That has already been happening. If you think that Democrats ignored billions in fraud while Republicans heroically rode in to save the day, that is nonsense. It's political theater layered on top of work that was already being done. 

3. Minnesota law requires daycare doors to be locked during operating hours. That is not suspicious behavior, it is a safety requirement to prevent unauthorized access to children. Walking up to a locked daycare door with a phone camera does not show fraud, it shows compliance. 

The GOP’s self admitted front man in this stunt, nick shirley, filmed outside facilities at arbitrary times and then implied emptiness meant no children existed. That implication collapses the moment you add context. Security footage released by the centers shows children being dropped off and picked up before and after his visit. Parents, kids, staff, all on camera. That directly contradicts the narrative he tried to sell. 

Reporters did what viral outrage merchants refuse to do, they verified. Journalists from the Star Tribune and local TV stations physically went inside the same daycare centers shown in the video and observed children and staff present during normal hours. That is not “don’t believe your eyes,” that is “don’t let a selectively edited clip replace basic verification.” 

This also was not newly discovered fraud. Issues with childcare and nonprofit fraud in Minnesota were identified, audited, and referred for prosecution years ago under Tim Walz’s administration, with federal authorities involved. Pretending a YouTuber uncovered some hidden conspiracy is revisionist nonsense. 

What people are actually being asked to believe is that locked doors required by law somehow prove a crime, while documented security footage, active licenses, inspections, and on site reporting should be ignored. That is not skepticism, that is confirmation bias.

After Shirley posted another video, Caring Guy replied:

4. GOP-backed Nick, you cut the video precisely where the facts stop helping your narrative. The Minnesota commissioner did not say the center was permanently shut down for fraud. She was describing a temporary licensing or status change, which happens routinely during compliance reviews, corrective action periods, or administrative transitions. You edited the clip to imply a final closure, when that is not what she said. That is not investigative journalism, it is omission by design. 

Receiving $1.9 million in a fiscal year is not proof of fraud. Child care assistance payments are volume based, spread across multiple funding streams, tied to enrollment, attendance, and subsidy eligibility. A center licensed for around 90 children can reach that dollar amount over a year without anything illegal occurring, especially when serving subsidized families. Big numbers sound shocking only when you refuse to explain how the program actually works. 

Locked doors, controlled entry, and sign in procedures are required by Minnesota child care law. You keep filming locked doors as if they are evidence of a crime. They are evidence of compliance. Every licensed daycare in the state is supposed to restrict access for child safety. This has already been explained to you repeatedly. 

You also misrepresented the federal action. The Department of Health and Human Services did not declare that Minnesota daycares committed fraud and then freeze funds as punishment. HHS imposed additional verification and documentation requirements while audits continue, which is a procedural step, not a finding of guilt. Payments resume when documentation is provided, because that is how audits work. Freezing verification pending review is not the same thing as proving fraud. 

 Most importantly, this was not some hidden scandal you uncovered. Minnesota identified child care and nonprofit fraud years ago, audited it, referred cases for prosecution, and involved federal authorities long before your YouTube channel showed up. Pretending you exposed something new is revisionist nonsense.

5. (In reply to Tom Emmer, GOP majority whip, who objected to a video from Minnesota Governor Walz:

Tommy boy, you really think the American people care about your lies? 

You mean another week of you falsely accusing Governor Tim Walz of scamming Minnesota, when the documented record shows the opposite. The fraud you keep referencing was uncovered by state agencies under his administration, referred to law enforcement, and prosecuted in coordination with federal authorities. That is not complicity; that is detection and enforcement. 

The Feeding Our Future scheme was identified by the Minnesota Department of Education starting in 2020 and escalated in 2021 after irregular meal claims were flagged. The state froze payments, referred the matter to prosecutors, and cooperated with a federal investigation that led to one of the largest pandemic fraud cases in the country. That investigation did not originate with outside influencers or partisan outrage posts, it came from auditors and state officials doing their jobs. 

As of the last two years alone, more than 70 individuals have been convicted or pleaded guilty in the case, with dozens more charged and awaiting trial. Federal prosecutors have already recovered hundreds of millions of dollars through forfeitures, restitution orders, and asset seizures, with more still pending. Several defendants received lengthy prison sentences, and additional indictments are ongoing. That is what accountability looks like, not a coverup.

The idea that Walz or his administration “scammed” Minnesota requires believing that state agencies simultaneously uncovered fraud, shut off funding, referred cases to law enforcement, cooperated with federal prosecutors, testified in court, and somehow were secretly running the scheme themselves. That is not a serious claim; it is a talking point that collapses the moment you apply basic causation. 

Under Walz, Minnesota identified the fraud, stopped the payments, brought in the feds, and prosecuted the criminals. The people who stole the money are being sentenced. The state that uncovered the crime is not the criminal. 

If you are looking for someone to be mad at, try the people who committed the fraud, not the administration that exposed it.  

 

So why not have the voter ID requirements Republicans are asking for?

Click "Show More."

Smith v. Trump; qualifications compared

Be sure to click "Show More."

Trump investigating 2020 election fraud! (Needless to say ...)

Click "Show More"!

Excerpt from President Zelenskyy's New Year's Address

“Let's start with the most important. What does Ukraine want? Peace? Yes. At any cost? No. We want the war to end, but not Ukraine. Are we tired? Very much so. Does this mean we're ready to surrender? Anyone who thinks that is deeply mistaken. They clearly still don't understand who Ukrainians are after all these years: A people enduring 1,407 days of full-scale war. Just consider those numbers. That's longer than Nazi occupation of many cities in World War II. 1,407 days of undefeated Ukraine, spending nights in shelters, fighting daily, often without electricity or sleep, many days at the front lines. But always without panic, chaos, or division - united for peace. Do we want the war to end? Absolutely. Why hasn't this happened yet? The answer lies with our neighbor. Can Russia end the war? Yes. Do they want to? No.” 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his New Year’s address, Wed, Dec 31, 2025

"A classic example of divide and conquer."

Reinier van Lanschot, Dutch politician and a Member of the European Parliament:

"What do Trump, Putin, Xi, and the tech autocrats have in common? They are all afraid of a united Europe. And that's why they want to destroy it. The US National Security Strategy says out loud what we have known for years: they want a Europe of 27 weak nations. A classic example of divide and conquer."

Jack Smith's testimony: devastating for Trump

Jack Smith was Special Counsel for President Biden's Department of Justice, overseeing criminal investigations of Donald Trump regarding Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol attack and his mishandling of classified government documents, both of which were dropped when Trump was reelected president. Trump's DOJ opened an investigation of Smith, alleging his actions had been politically motivated.

The House Judiciary Committee recently deposed Smith. Smith asked that his deposition be conducted in public, but the committee instead held the proceedings behind closed doors. Transcript and video of the deposition has just been released. 

I asked ChatGPT: The House Judiciary committee has released special counsel Jack Smith's 255-page deposition. The contents seem highly unfavorable for Trump. Why would the committee, chaired by Republican Jim Jordan, do such a thing?

Here's the reply: 

At first glance it does seem counterintuitive for a Republican-led House Judiciary Committee to release material that reflects badly on Donald Trump. But there are several plausible—and not mutually exclusive—reasons why Jim Jordan’s committee would do it anyway.

1. They believe the process matters more than the optics

Jordan’s committee has consistently framed its investigation as being about alleged politicization of the Justice Department, not about protecting Trump personally. From that perspective:

  • Releasing the full deposition supports their claim of transparency.

  • It lets them argue: “We’re not selectively leaking—read it yourself.”

  • Even unfavorable testimony can be presented as evidence of an overzealous or ideologically driven prosecutor, depending on how Republicans interpret Smith’s answers.

In short, they may believe voters care more about how Trump was investigated than what Smith says about Trump.

2. They assume supporters won’t read 255 pages

This is a very practical political calculation:

  • Most voters—including most Trump supporters—will not read the deposition.

  • What matters is the spin, not the underlying document.

  • Republicans can cherry-pick portions they think help their case (e.g., limits on Smith’s knowledge, reliance on DOJ precedents, internal constraints).

Meanwhile, releasing the full document helps deflect accusations that they are hiding something.

3. Preempting leaks or court-ordered disclosure

Another common motive in congressional investigations:

  • If the deposition was likely to become public anyway—through leaks, FOIA litigation, or court filings—releasing it themselves lets Republicans control the timing and framing.

  • It’s often better politically to say “we released this voluntarily” than to be forced into disclosure later.

4. Institutional interests of Congress

House Judiciary Republicans have been trying to reassert Congress’s authority over DOJ and special counsels generally:

  • Publishing Smith’s testimony creates a public record that can be cited in future legislation or oversight fights.

  • Even damaging testimony can be useful if it shows how much discretion a special counsel has, how decisions were made internally, or how insulated Smith was from political accountability.

From this view, Trump is almost secondary to a longer-term institutional battle.

5. Different Republican factions, different incentives

Not all House Republicans are equally invested in shielding Trump:

  • Some members are more focused on anti-DOJ messaging.

  • Others are positioning themselves as champions of government transparency, regardless of whom it hurts.

  • Jordan himself often prioritizes the fight with federal law enforcement over Trump’s personal legal exposure.

That can lead to decisions that frustrate Trump allies but still make sense within GOP internal politics.

6. Confidence that Trump’s base is immovable

There is also a blunt political reality:

  • Republicans may believe that no testimony—however damaging—will meaningfully erode Trump’s core support.

  • If that’s true, the downside risk of releasing the deposition is low, while the upside (credibility, transparency claims, oversight precedent) is real.


Bottom line

The committee likely calculated that releasing Jack Smith’s deposition:

  • Strengthens their transparency and oversight narrative

  • Helps them in a broader fight with DOJ and special counsels

  • Carries little political risk with Trump’s base

  • Allows Republicans—not Democrats—to control how the document enters the public domain

So even if the substance is unfavorable to Trump, the institutional and political incentives for Jim Jordan’s committee can still point toward disclosure.

 

60 Minutes: Trump government lied in 35+ court cases

The next edition of 60 Minutes after Bari Weiss, editor-in-chief of CBS News, pulled the disgraceful CECOT revelations from the air, contains this gem:

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Step right up! Get it while it lasts!

I asked ChatGPT, 'I know about sneakers, guitars, watches; what else has Trump offered for sale?" Here's the response:

"

Yes — beyond sneakers, guitars, and watches, Donald Trump (and the various organizations selling items under his name or brand) has offered a surprisingly wide array of products for sale over the years. Many of these leverage his political brand and appeal to supporters or collectors. Forbes+1

πŸ›️ Merchandise & Products Trump Has Sold or Licensed

πŸͺ™ Collectibles & Branded Goods

  • Silver and Gold Coins / Medallions – collectible coins featuring Trump’s likeness or presidential symbols. X (formerly Twitter)

  • NFT Trading Cards & Digital Collectibles – digital cards and NFTs sold around his campaigns. Forbes

  • Autographed Memorabilia – signed guitars, mugs, photos, and other items. Forbes

  • Books – royalty income from books, including Save America (illustrated coffee-table type editions). New York Post

πŸ“– Books & Religious Items

  • “God Bless the U.S.A.” Bible – branded editions of the Bible, some themed (e.g., “Veteran” editions) and even limited signature versions. Wikipedia

πŸ‘• Apparel & Campaign Swag

  • Hats and T-shirts with slogans like Make America Great Again and Trump 2028 gear (hats, shirts, coolers). Business Insider

  • Flags, Stickers, and Home Decor – MAGA flags, wall art, magnets, and similar items available from official stores. Trump Official Store

☕️ Everyday Items & Accessories

  • Coffee Mugs and Travel Cups — sometimes signed or tied to specific events. Forbes

  • Tote Bags, Wallets, Bobbleheads, Teddy Bears, License Plate Frames, Puzzles — various branded accessories and collectibles available through the “Donald Trump Store.” The Donald Trump Store

πŸ“± Tech & Telecom (Recent and Upcoming)

  • Trump Mobile & T1 Smartphone — a gold-colored smartphone with MAGA-style branding and a Trump-branded mobile plan, although the launch has faced delays. The Guardian

πŸ’„ Fragrances

  • Cologne & Perfume Lines — branded fragrances such as Victory 47 and Fight Fight Fight scents. The Times

🧨 Notes on These Products

  • Many items are sold via licensing deals — Trump often licenses his name to other companies rather than manufacturing the products himself. Wikipedia

  • A number of the products tie directly to his political identity, presidential terms (e.g., 45, 47), or campaign messaging. X (formerly Twitter)

  • Trump has pursued legal action against unauthorized sellers of “Trump merchandise” (e.g., counterfeit MAGA shirts and mugs).

 

Bernie on AI

While Hillary would have been light years better than Trump, maybe Bernie would have been even better -- if a self-described socialist could ever be elected president. I don't know what the effects of AI are going to turn out to be, but I damn sure don't want the development to be run by the oligarchs and tech bros without regulation.

Heather Cox Richardson's wrap-up of 2025

Click here for HCR's diary entry on December 30, 2025.

I just learned that Trump has declared nine different national emergencies (none of which was a true emergency), which allows him to take unilateral action. It's useful, of course, in the case of actual emergencies, allowing the president to take rapid action in response without having to go through a fractured congress; but it's not useful in the case of bogus emergencies, declared so that he can bomb boats off the coast of Venezuela or harass immigrants (e.g. renditioning people to the CECOT prison in El Salvador where they will be tortured.

I knew this had happened, but what I didn't know is that if the president declares an emergency and takes action, he can only proceed for 15 days; after that, the action must stop unless validated by congress. For instance, as HCR says, in April, Trump declared some kind of national emergency that allowed him to impose a broad, sweeping system of harsh tariffs. After the 15-day period, Democrats would definitely challenge the tariffs, since the imposition of tariffs is a right granted strictly to congress. Such a challenge would almost certainly succeed. However -- and he is allowed by House rules to do this -- Speaker Johnson declared that for the narrow purpose of the emergency actions, the remainder of the legislative session -- until the next election -- to be considered as one day. One day! Thus the 15-day mark could never be reached, and no one can challenge Trump's bogus emergencies. Preposterous. 

After recounting the highlights -- there were many, many more examples of Trump acting in an authoritarian fashion -- HCR ends on an optimistic note that I don't entirely agree with:

As we reach the end of 2025, it appears the law is catching up to an administration that began the year by acting as if the law and the Constitution didn’t exist.

More than that, though, over the course of 2025, the administration’s refusal to recognize the tenets of American democracy has roused the American people to defend that democracy.

It appears that as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, when British colonists on the North American continent took the radical step of rejecting the idea not just of King George III but of all kings, and launched the experiment of government based on the rule of law created by the people themselves, the American people are reclaiming that history.

 

Monday, December 29, 2025

Trump-Zelensky meeting at Mar-a-Lago, December 28, 2025

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's "Letters from an American" diary entry on Monday, December 29. 

The article starts by saying that Trump said in a televised interview that the U.S. had hit Venezuelan docks that were loading facilities for drugs. But no U.S. organization -- State Department, CIA, DEA, U.S. Special Operations Command, etc. -- has verified Trump's statement. Neither has Venenzuela. So Americans find themselves in the situation of wondering whether it even happened, or is it something Trump has read or hears somewhere and he got it wrong. 

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo commented: “It’s a good commentary on 2025 that the US President announces a major military attack on a foreign country and even the straightest arrows think, 50% chance it’s an attack, 50% chance president is on another cognition bender.”
 Then she gets into Zelensky's meeting with Trump. While Trump had met Putin on the red carpet rolled out for him when he arrived to meet with Trump in Alaska in August, Zelensky's visit was treated a little differently: no U.S. government representative was there to greet Zelensky. The only official representative was Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S.

Trump had a 2-hour phone call with Putin immediately before the Mar-a-Lago meeting; Trump told reporters after the meeting that Putin had expressed a desire that Ukraine succeed (??!!). A news item from the day was that Russia reported that 90 drones had attacked Putin's home, a report that was immediately denied by Ukraine. It made Trump angry, however, and while there has been no proof that the attack took place, Trump said that Putin had told him on the phone call that the attack had taken place.

 Weird. 

Friday, December 26, 2025

"What's really going on with Europe now."

This is a post by Peter W. Kruger copied directly from Twitter:


My dear American friends, let me give you the clear picture of what’s really going on with Europe now.
 
For the last 80 years, Western European public opinion was essentially split in two. On one side, about half of us truly hated you: the hard Marxist-lefties, who, living in the Soviet paradise delusion, viewed you as the embodiment of imperialist capitalism; the extreme-right who resented you for defeating them and for kicking them out of power back in 1945. 
 
But, on the other side, mostly in the center (but not only), you had the rest of Western European public opinion that was enormously grateful for what you had done during World War 2 and after: for freeing Europe of nazi-fascist oppression, and even more for protecting us against the Soviet threat. 
 
I was part of the latter group and, boy, did we love you. We loved your pop culture, your consumer products, your innovation, the spirit of freedom, originality, and optimism that came from America. We defended you against our own cynics. And guess what? We were also among the loudest critics of Europe, accusing it of being too complacent, reliant on others, bogged down by bureaucracy, and failing to ensure its own security and freedoms. (Not that your protection didn’t come with massive returns for you in terms of market-access and the trillions of US treasuries that we bought to prop up your ridiculously gigantic public debt...). 
 
Here is the problem now. Over the past few years, and especially since you brought Mr Brain-Rot MAGA Uber-Moron in Command back to the White House, not to mention the whole gang of globally corrupt and Russian-fed tech-broligarcs from Silicon Valley, you’ve managed to really hard piss off even that part of Western public opinion that loved you and respected you. 
 
Yeah, you may think that now you’ve made new friends in Europe. But don’t be fooled by the apparent Euro ultra-right enthusiasm for Trump, from the likes of Orban, Fico, Salvini etc.. They see you as instrumental in tearing down the EU edifice, but deep down, believe me, they hate you more than even the most radical euro-communist. Their ideology is pure "Blood and Soil." They will never forgive you for what you did to them 80 years ago (just as Putin will never forgive you for what you did to the Soviet Union 40 years ago). Plus, as true suprematist-racists, they believe that no society is more culturally and racially corrupt than the USA with all its racial and ethnic diversity. You’re the epitome of rot to them. They are using you to dismantle the European Union. Once that is done, you will find that their nationalism excludes you just as fiercely as it excludes everyone else. And good luck with selling them your junk food and products (you have no freaking idea how protectionist, conservative, and reactionary they are). You’ll discover it soon.
 
And don’t get me even started with Central-Eastern Europeans. Everyone loved you in Poland, Romania, the Baltics, etc. (even the communists, though they could never say so publicly). They know the cost of occupation. But they also know all too well the price of Western backstabbing (as when they were abandoned to Stalin by Roosevelt & co.). Now that you’ve decided to leave them totally exposed to resurgent Russian genocidal imperialism, you are converting their love into a profound sense of betrayal. 
 
Though, be reassured. No matter how difficult the situation may be for us, Europe is going nowhere. We’ve been here for the last 5000 years, since the first Indo-European nomads started roaming west from the steppe plains (yes, modern day Ukraine…). We survived multiple civilization collapses, plagues, invasions, religious civil wars, the wildest revolutions, an almost continuous state of war, including inflicting on ourselves the most devastating World Wars of all time. There's absolutely no place on earth that has gone through so much history as Europe has (forget the Sumerians and Egyptian pyramids). And yet, we’re still here. Going nowhere. It may take time (and a lot of suffering), but we’ll adapt also to your betrayal. 
 
In the meantime, good luck dealing with the New Imperial Global Multipolar Order that your current leadership is so enthusiastically willing to negotiate with the Putins, Modis, and Xi Jinpings of the world (on the spoils of “weak” Europe). You have no idea. As a society, you are even more fractured, polarized and weaker than Europe is. Putin, Modi, and Xi Jinping are just going to eat you up for breakfast. 
 
Oh, yeah. In the darkest moments, don’t come whining over the Atlantic. No matter what, no one trusts you anymore here. We may still help you, but it won't come free ad it will require a lot of forgiveness. After all, that’s the fate reserved to all traitors.
StenoCommander



Thursday, December 25, 2025

Gunfire at Nakatomi Plaza!

Anderson Cooper and Even Perez at CNN have more on the story:

Trump's a very aesthetic person.

Click here for a 3D look inside the Trump Gold -- I mean White House.

Monday, December 22, 2025

Blatant Trump Corruption

"On Dec 5, FIFA handed Donald Trump a made-up honor called the “FIFA Peace Prize.” Four days later — Dec 9 — Trump’s DOJ moved to kill a major FIFA corruption case."

Trump appoints a special envoy to Greenland.

Trump appointed the sitting governor of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, to fill a new post, special envoy to Greenland.

In his acceptance of the post, Landry stated: “It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the U.S.” 

Here is the text of an open letter from the Prime Minister of Greenland (an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark):

Dear fellow citizens, 
 
Once again, we have woken up to a new statement from the American president, who has now appointed a special envoy to Greenland. It may sound significant, but it does not change anything for us here at home. We decide our own future. Greenland is our country. We have our own democracy, our own decisions, and a strong community that stands firm. Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people, and territorial integrity must be respected. We are happy to cooperate with other countries, including the United States, but this must always be done with respect for us and for our values and wishes. There is no reason for concern. We stand together, and we stand firm.
 
Take good care of one another as we approach Christmas.
 
In other words, don't pay any attention to Trump; it's just more hot air. 

King Donald I

Click here for an excellent article in The New York Times by Peter Baker, entitled "Trump Takes America's 'Imperial Presidency' to a New Level," subtitled "In his first year back in the White House, President Trump has greatly expanded executive power while embracing the trappings of royalty in ways not seen in the modern era."

When President Trump hosted the crown prince of Saudi Arabia last month, he pulled out all the stops. To the traditional pomp of a formal White House visit, he added a few even fancier touches: a stirring military flyover, a procession of black horses and long, regal tables for the lavish dinner in the East Room instead of the typical round tables.

For surprised White House veterans who were paying attention, the unusual flourishes looked a little familiar. Just two months earlier, King Charles III of Britain welcomed Mr. Trump for a state visit that included, yes, a stirring military flyover, a procession of black horses and a long, regal table for the lavish dinner in St. George’s Hall at Windsor Palace.

In his first year back in office, Mr. Trump has unabashedly adopted the trappings of royalty just as he has asserted virtually unbridled power to transform American government and society to his liking. In both pageantry and policy, Mr. Trump has established a new, more audacious version of the imperial presidency that goes far beyond even the one associated with Richard M. Nixon, for whom the term was popularized half a century ago.

What do Americans think of their new monarch?

To his supporters, Mr. Trump’s assertion of vast power is invigorating, not disturbing. In a country they see in decline, a strong hand is the only way to dislodge a liberal, “woke” deep state that in their view has suffocated everyday Americans to the advantage of unwelcome immigrants, street criminals, globalist tycoons, underqualified minorities and out-of-touch elites. Voters struggling to maintain their standards of living or make sense of a society changing rapidly around them have twice given Mr. Trump a chance to make good on his promise to blow up politics as usual and address their concerns.

To his critics, Mr. Trump is narcissistic, uncouth, corrupt and a danger to American democracy. He has used the office to enrich himself and his family, sullied the image of the United States around the world, sought to erase the true history of Black Americans and pursued policies that harm the very people he purports to represent.

Will Trump be successful in his attempts?

Russell Riley, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, acknowledged the nation’s long history of expanding presidential authority. But, he added, “we have an equally robust history of cramming the presidency back into its constitutional box once war or economic crisis has passed.” 

 

 

Sunday, December 21, 2025

Of all the things that didn't happen, this didn't happen the most.

Tucker Carlson's problems are worse than I thought.

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Krugman on Social Media

Click here for a Substack article by Paul Krugman entitled "America Has Become A Digital Narco-State."

He compares social media, with the potential and actual harm it does, to the narcotics industry. 

Yesterday I wrote about how hostility to Europe is a central theme of the Trump administration’s recently released National Security Strategy. The main driver of that hostility appears to be MAGA fury at the nations of Europe for being excessively protective of civil liberties and insufficiently racist.

A secondary source of anti-Europe sentiment, however, is the tech broligarchy’s fury at the European Union’s Digital Services Act. The Act obliges large platforms to self-police a variety of potential injurious effects ranging from “dissemination of illegal content” to “negative consequences” for “physical and mental well-being.”

Krugman says:

Under the auspices of its Digital Services Act, the European Commission imposed its first fine last week — 120 million euros, basically a tiny slap on the wrist — on Musk’s X. The Commission’s case is straightforward:

· X’s “Blue checks” are a fraud. X claims that a blue check means that the poster’s identity has been verified. But in fact X sells them without making any effort to verify that posters are who they say they are.

· X does not provide enough information on advertisements for outsiders to determine whether or not they are scams

· X refuses to make its public data available to researchers

These are clear violations of European law, and the fine, as I said, was little more than a slap on the wrist. Yet Musk went berserk, declaring that the EU should be abolished and threatening personal retribution against the “woke Stasi commissars” responsible for the fine.

And he finishes:

The key point is that if you think of unregulated social media as dangerous drugs, as you should, then we’ve become a nation in which drug lords control much of government policy. Social media billionaires have enough power to prevent us from protecting our own children. They have enough power to dictate U.S. foreign policy, punishing our erstwhile allies for daring to limit their ability to push their product.

America has, in practice, become a digital narco-state.

 

 

 

Saturday, December 6, 2025

An alarming American proclamation

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's entry in her diary, Letters from an American, for December 5, 2025, where she talks about the quiet release of the United States' 2025 National Security Strategy.

"The Trump administration’s NSS announces a dramatic reworking of the foreign policy the U.S. has embraced since World War II." 

The NSS is intended to be published annually, though some years have been missed, particularly under Clinton's administration. 

The document reorients the U.S. away from traditional European allies toward Russia. The authors reject Europe’s current course, suggesting that Europe is in danger of “civilizational erasure” and calling for the U.S. to “help Europe correct its current trajectory” by “restoring Europe’s civilizational self-confidence and Western identity.” Allowing continued migration will render Europe “unrecognizable” within twenty years, the authors say, and they back away from NATO by suggesting that as they become more multicultural, Europe’s societies might have a different relationship to NATO than “those who signed the NATO charter.”

In contrast to their complaints about the liberal democracies in Europe, the document’s authors do not suggest that Russia is a country of concern to the U.S., a dramatic change from past NSS documents. Instead, they complain that “European officials…hold unrealistic expectations” for an end to Russia’s war against Ukraine, and that European governments are suppressing far-right political parties. They bow to Russian demands by calling for “[e]nding the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance.”

Furthermore:

Walking away from the U.S.-led international systems that reinforce the principles of national self-determination and have kept the world relatively safe since World War II, the Trump administration is embracing the old idea of spheres of influence in which less powerful countries are controlled by great powers, a system in place before World War II and favored now by Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, among others.

National security specialist Anne Applebaum wrote: “The new National Security Strategy is a propaganda document, designed to be widely read. It is also a performative suicide. Hard to think of another great power ever abdicating its influence so quickly and so publicly.”

European Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Ulrike Franke commented: “The transatlantic relationship as we know it is over. Yes, we kinda knew this. But this is now official US White House policy. Not a speech, not a statement. The West as it used to be no longer exists.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, December 5, 2025

We need Cam on the Fever!

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Paul Krugman on Trump's treatment of disaster victims

Click here for Paul Krugman's Substack article on December 3, 2025, entitled "Trump to Disaster Victims: Drop Dead."

 The cruelty of Trump and his crew is a feature, not a bug. 

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Pete Hegseth, 2016, on war crimes and following unlawful orders

Monday, December 1, 2025

Trump corruption

Click here for the Heather Cox Richardson entry in her diary, Letters from an American, for November 30, 2025. It details some of Trump's and his family's corruption -- but it's just the tip of the iceberg. There's so much more.

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Hey, ATCs -- control this!

Thursday, November 27, 2025

"The worst of the worst?" I don't think so.

Trump's Golf Tab

 

Trump Is Racking Up a Colossal Tab Just Playing Golf

A new report reveals the extraordinary sum President Trump has spent playing golf.

Donald Trump swings a golf club and wears a white USA cap.
Jane Barlow/PA Images/Getty Images

Donald Trump has already spent $70 million of taxpayer money on golfing in less than a year as president. If this pace keeps up, he will spend $300 million playing golf by the time his second term ends. 

HuffPost reports that the president on Wednesday made his sixteenth trip this year to his Mar-a-Lago estate and went golfing. Each trip carries a $3.4 million bill in travel and security costs. If Trump decides to go to Mar-a-Lago twice more before the end of the year, he will have spent a total of $75 million on golf, which, repeated each of the following three years, would result in $300 million spent on the trips.

That’s nearly double the $151.5 million in tax dollars Trump spent golfing in his first term as president. Trump spent a third of 2017, his first year as president, hanging out at his private clubs. This time, Trump has also made nine trips to his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, spending $1.1 million on each trip. He also went to Aberdeen, Scotland, in July to promote a new golf course at his resort there, spending close to $10 million on the trip.  

The security costs Trump incurs on his Florida trips can get pretty high, with machine gun–mounted patrol boats manning the nearby Intracoastal Waterway and the Coast Guard patrolling in the vicinity in the Atlantic Ocean. Using Air Force One costs $273,063 per hour to fly to Palm Beach International Airport, meaning that one four-hour round trip to Mar-a-Lago costs the taxpayer $1.1 million. 

In 2016, before Trump was elected, he mocked President Obama’s work ethic, claiming that he was “worse than Carter” for how often he golfed. In the end, Obama only spent $85 million of taxpayer dollars in his eight years as president on golf. 

Meanwhile, Trump has not only eclipsed that in his nearly five years as president, he’s shaped his presidency around golf. He has promoted his golf business on the White House social platform and even decided to deploy the National Guard in Washington, D.C., because he hated seeing homeless people on his way to play golf. 

Last month, Trump took dirt from his White House demolition and sent it to a golf course he’s taking over in Washington. It’s a fitting act for his presidency: taking something from the taxpayer and putting it toward playing an expensive game that he appears to cheat at. 

Sunday, November 23, 2025

Donald Trump and Andrew Johnson

Click here for Heather Cox Richardson's diary entry in "Letters from an American" for November 22, 2025.

 On Tuesday, November 18, six Democratic lawmakers, veterans of the U.S. military or intelligence services, released a video saying service members should refuse to obey unlawful orders. This should not have received any criticism, as the principle is a cornerstone of U.S. military doctrine; events such as the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, national guard troops killing student demonstrators at Kent State, and the prisoner mistreatment at Abu Ghraib during the Iraq war would not have taken place had soldiers refused their orders. The German defense at the Nuremberg trials -- "I was a good soldier; I was only following orders" -- did not stand up, and the defendants were all either hanged or sentenced to long prison terms.

Donald Trump didn't see it that way, and posted on social media that this was "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" Today, November 23, he is continuing to attack the six lawmakers.

Richardson notes that Trump's behavior is not unprecedented; Andrew Johnson, a Southern Democrat who became president for the remainder of Lincoln's term, from 1865 until 1868, had called for certain Republican opponents to be hanged. For this and other reasons, Johnson was impeached in the House, and escaped conviction in the Senate (and consequent removal from office) by a single vote.

 Richardson's article goes into some detail about Johnson's behavior during his term in office, when he attempted to repress black Americans in the south (he was a strong Southern Democrat) and undo Lincoln's civil rights achievements. Johnson had a tumultuous term in office, and his reactionary policies resulted in a massive defeat in the midterms in 1866, with Republicans winning a two-thirds majority in the House. The House proceeded to pass the Fourteenth Amendment, granting citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and ensuring equal protection under the law, particularly for former slaves, and prohibiting the denial of life, liberty, or property without due process.

Johnson is widely considered the second-worst president in history, after James Buchanan (1856-1860), who allowed the South to slip into the Civil War. (Trump is generally considered the third-worst, but since he seems to be doing worse every day, he may yet pass Buchanan and Johnson in the worst-president sweepstakes.)